Dr. Maserati said:
Actually you accused me earlier of making something up - but hey lets forget that shall we.
You may want to look at original post - it says 'proof', see these ' either side of it.
Because, yes - believe it or not that was Contadors defense. I ate contaminated meat, and how we all laughed. Then they said they have a receipt for this meat - it even goes in to detail where in Spain.
There is trace-ability of meat in the EU. Contador would have been better advised to not produce a receipt.
once again, this post shows how fundamentally flawed your position is and how little appreciation you have for the details and patient analysis of evidence despite you repeatedly assuring the forum that you are here to learn.
yes, i accused you of making up stuff - the statement you made - because you failed to back up it's essence.
as we started taking apart your false statement, you now are trying to deflect into the forum fairytales, in stead of following your own, apparently flawed, statement.
so, let's repeat, how a purchase receipt is a proof (in your own words): 'offered 'proof' that he ate meat from a country that does not have a problem with Clenbuterol'.
a purchase receipt proves it was purchased in a certain country, it says nothing about where the meat came from. it may or may not help tracing the farm or the country...far from the falsehood you perpetuated. as far as we know contador still does not know where his meat came from.
so please provide the evidence rather than misguided leaps in logic.