A
Anonymous
Guest
Benotti69 said:The course yet again proved that the UCI know absolutely nothing about cycling.
I agree with this.
Benotti69 said:The course yet again proved that the UCI know absolutely nothing about cycling.
Martin318is said:thanks for that - was just about to watch the recording.
everyone please take this as a reminder to try and avoid spoilers in active threads.![]()
Libertine Seguros said:When was the last time we had a true climbers' WC? As in one that the classics men couldn't compete at?
I don't think we should have a "mountain WC" that only the climbers can compete at. Mendrisio was good, as it wasn't tough enough to put classics men like Gilbert, Cancellara and Kolobnev out of contention. But that's probably as tough as it should get.
But since I don't think we should have a WC where only the pure climbers can win, I similarly don't think we should have a WC where only the sprinters should win. A "hard" worlds should at least be easy enough to give other classes of cyclist a chance to feel they can compete, but just as that, an "easy" worlds should at least have something hard enough to give other classes of cyclist a chance to feel they can compete. A worlds that is less selective than the first three stages of the Tour de Pologne put together is no Worlds at all.
GroupDK said:Denmark is a totally flat country..(have that in mind)
and likely Denmark was chosed because we have a fully-integrated cycling culture..like no other country, and that makes a kapital / copenhagen the most green city in the world.(and set a good example in the green house effect problems)
About the cycling culture..
http://www.streetfilms.org/cycling-copenhagen-through-north-american-eyes/
But dont forget a WC is primary a show, and just to todays round about course there was 250.000 spectators (police estimates).
Which only makes it worse that they served up such a stinker of a course. I'm not expecting them to putt Kiddevej in a course in Vejle or anything, but SOMETHING, and for goodness sakes don't put the feed zone on the only hill that could possibly be a platform for attacking!!!Zoetemelk-fan said:Apparently, you don't know Denmark, if you say Copenhagen = Denmark. Plenty of opportunities to make a very hard course several places in Jutland (main land), that would seperate the peleton into pieces.
Benotti69 said:The course yet again proved that the UCI know absolutely nothing about cycling.
Amsterhammer said:![]()
..........
ahahahahaha, half of the forum is delighted the other half disgusted and you are busy scouting the podium girlsAmsterhammer said:![]()
..........
Michielveedeebee said:yes they should. As should classics men and climbers.
spalco said:Hmm, anyone spot Gilbert at the finish? Sagan?
Face it haters: Mark Cavendish - the rider of the year 2011!![]()
Maxiton said:I totally see what you're saying and I don't disagree. I just don't have a problem with a one-off parcours that highlights cycling's extraordinary sprinter.
Maxiton said:I totally see what you're saying and I don't disagree. I just don't have a problem with a one-off parcours that highlights cycling's extraordinary sprinter.
Michielveedeebee said:Geelong wasn't really a sprinters race, more a classics course imo. Madrid was also way harder than this, Valverde was contesting the sprint ftw, not guys like Greipel, Cav and Goss.
spalco said:Hmm, anyone spot Gilbert at the finish? Sagan?
Face it haters: Mark Cavendish - the rider of the year 2011!![]()
The Hitch said:Does anyone btw know what the course in Madrid was. Ive tried looking on the internet but cant even find a picture of the race, yet alone a profile or a map
Although I agree with some of your points, I would ask what about a hilly-ish course, which would have been tailored for Gilbert - would that devalue it as much as it wouldn't be a sense of occasion as it would just be another "Gilbert attacks in hill in last 3kms and wins easily" like a load of other races he wins.Libertine Seguros said:The WC stripes are not devalued by Cav having them. But they are devalued by being given out for a race less selective than a flat stage in the Tour of Turkey. It doesn't feel like Cavendish has truly ACHIEVED anything out of the ordinary by winning this race. It doesn't feel like a World Championship, more like a neverending Scheldeprijs.
The UCI obviously wanted Cavendish in rainbows because it's marketing gold, and that's fine. Nothing against Cavendish for winning a course that was selected to give him the best chance.
But if there's no sense of occasion, and nothing special about a World Championship win, then it begs the question why have them at all. This was nothing more than routine for Cavendish, the only difference was he was wearing a British jersey, sorry, skinsuit, instead of an HTC one.
The race was abysmal and provided no spectacle, and the sport should be embarrassed to call it a World Championships.
The Hitch said:Does anyone btw know what the course in Madrid was. Ive tried looking on the internet but cant even find a picture of the race, yet alone a profile or a map
Waterloo Sunrise said:I disagree entirely. It's the seductive tyranny of the middle way she's arguing for. I'd rather have a bit of variety than try to concoct a course that allegedly gives lots of people a chance, but in practice means the race is decided by the same 10 guys every year.
palmerq said:ahahahahaha, half of the forum is delighted the other half disgusted and you are busy scouting the podium girlsit is a nice change from a lot of the other posts.
FignonLeGrand said:All this moaning about the course is ridiculous. I agree it wasnt an interesting parcours but on the other hand its right that many countries get the opportunity to host it and not find a course in the middle of no where to make it interesting.
Seems that this forum wants every race/ stage to be a combination of the best classics routes every single race. Its just not gonna happen.
