2011 Tour de France, Stage 12: Cugnaux - Luz-Ardiden, 209 km

Page 51 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
ericthesportsman6 said:
Velits and Sanchez down. If they're injured.....

Ok this is absolutely ridiculous. Could the mods create a rule against false information.

It was clear when it happened that the Euskaltel rider was NOT Sanchez.

For one all other EE riders rode by. Usually a sign that its not a team leader. Also the guy did not have an gold helmet and did not have a 1 on his rider number.

You do realise EE have more than 1 rider:rolleyes:

But there you go ahead, see a Orange rider down and try to gain ego forum points by declaring its Sanchez.

So those who could tell that it wasnt Sanchez that fell, start believeing there is some other fall which has the Asturian as a casualty.,

False information presented as fact is not on.

Mods please do something about it.
 
Jun 10, 2010
19,892
2,252
25,680
The Hitch said:
Where did you here that Sanchez is down?
Euskaltel down
Do I know any Euskaltel rider aside from Samu? No
Therefore, Samu down

There you have it, commentator logic.
 
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
Timmy-loves-Rabo said:
@hitch it wasnt



.

I knew it wasnt sanchez who fell initialy but when someone comes on and says Sanchez has fallen, you believe there is another crash.
 
Jun 22, 2009
10,644
2
0
The Hitch said:
Ok this is absolutely ridiculous. Could the mods create a rule against false information.

It was clear when it happened that the Euskaltel rider was NOT Sanchez.

For one all other EE riders rode by. Usually a sign that its not a team leader. Also the guy did not have an orange helmet and did not have a 1 on his rider number.

You do realise EE have more than 1 rider:rolleyes:

But there you go ahead, see a Orange rider down and try to gain ego forum points by declaring its Sanchez.

So those who could tell that it wasnt Sanchez that fell, start believeing there is some other fall which has the Asturian as a casualty.,

False information presented as fact is not on.

Mods please do something about it.

seriously.. he made a mistake.
big deal.
 
Nov 17, 2009
2,388
0
0
The Hitch said:
Ok this is absolutely ridiculous. Could the mods create a rule against false information.

It was clear when it happened that the Euskaltel rider was NOT Sanchez.

For one all other EE riders rode by. Usually a sign that its not a team leader. Also the guy did not have an orange helmet and did not have a 1 on his rider number.

You do realise EE have more than 1 rider:rolleyes:

But there you go ahead, see a Orange rider down and try to gain ego forum points by declaring its Sanchez.

So those who could tell that it wasnt Sanchez that fell, start believeing there is some other fall which has the Asturian as a casualty.,

False information presented as fact is not on.

Mods please do something about it.

Take it easy. If the mods kicked off everyone who misidentified a rider in a race thread, everyone who posts in a race thread would be gone.
 
Jul 6, 2009
446
15
9,310
kurtinsc said:
Take it easy. If the mods kicked off everyone who misidentified a rider in a race thread, everyone who posts in a race thread would be gone.

Heck Liggett and Sherwin would not even make out of the opening introduction of the day show if they were kicked when they misidentified a rider.
 
Jul 4, 2010
5,669
1,349
20,680
The Hitch said:
Ok this is absolutely ridiculous. Could the mods create a rule against false information.

It was clear when it happened that the Euskaltel rider was NOT Sanchez.

For one all other EE riders rode by. Usually a sign that its not a team leader. Also the guy did not have an gold helmet and did not have a 1 on his rider number.

You do realise EE have more than 1 rider:rolleyes:

But there you go ahead, see a Orange rider down and try to gain ego forum points by declaring its Sanchez.

So those who could tell that it wasnt Sanchez that fell, start believeing there is some other fall which has the Asturian as a casualty.,

False information presented as fact is not on.

Mods please do something about it.


Ooooo came down!
 
Feb 1, 2011
9,403
2,275
20,680
hrotha said:
Euskaltel down
Do I know any Euskaltel rider aside from Samu? No
Therefore, Samu down

There you have it, commentator logic.

What made me concerned was how long the french directors focused the picture on the guy on the ground despite the not-that-serious looking fall; but I guess that was because of Klöden and not the Euskaltel.
 
Mar 11, 2009
3,273
1
0
Hoogerland in a chasse patate behind Chavanel and Kreuziger.
Maybe a couple of days too early for him.
 
Apr 14, 2009
1,704
204
10,880
kurtinsc said:
Take it easy. If the mods kicked off everyone who misidentified a rider in a race thread, everyone who posts in a race thread would be gone.

Damn straight. Phil said four or five times it was Sanchez because the fallen rider had a golden helmet. If even Phil can make a mistake anyone can.
 
Sep 16, 2009
3,164
4
13,485
I'm with Hitch 100%.

People should stop listening to Phil and Paul. The blokes wouldn't be able to tell the difference between Osama Bin Laden and Cadel Evans on a bike.
 
Jul 28, 2010
2,274
0
0
The Barb said:
Damn straight. Phil said four or five times it was Sanchez because the fallen rider had a golden helmet. If even Phil can make a mistake anyone can.

And boy does he make a lot!
 
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
kurtinsc said:
Take it easy. If the mods kicked off everyone who misidentified a rider in a race thread, everyone who posts in a race thread would be gone.

I got banned for joking that if the guy who took out Contador wants forgiveness he should take out Schleck and Basso.

Under these standards stating as fact " Sanchez is down" should definately be worth a strike.

Timmy-loves-Rabo said:
seriously.. he made a mistake.
big deal.

Somehow i believe your reaction would be slightly different if you were reading the forum and saw "Gesink down, will he get back up." :rolleyes:
 
Apr 27, 2011
384
0
0
The Hitch said:
Ok this is absolutely ridiculous. Could the mods create a rule against false information.

It was clear when it happened that the Euskaltel rider was NOT Sanchez.

For one all other EE riders rode by. Usually a sign that its not a team leader. Also the guy did not have an gold helmet and did not have a 1 on his rider number.

You do realise EE have more than 1 rider:rolleyes:

But there you go ahead, see a Orange rider down and try to gain ego forum points by declaring its Sanchez.

So those who could tell that it wasnt Sanchez that fell, start believeing there is some other fall which has the Asturian as a casualty.,

False information presented as fact is not on.

Mods please do something about it.

It's July buddy, won't happen in the Vuelta
 
Jun 19, 2009
4,071
1,400
18,680
This has been a shambles of a stage so far. Slow. Minimal attacks. Few riders interested in KOM. And yet more crashes
 
Jun 22, 2009
10,644
2
0
The Hitch said:
I got banned for suggesting that if the guy who took out Contador wants forgiveness he should take out Schleck and Basso.

Under these standards stating as fact " Sanchez is down" should definately be worth a strike.



Somehow i believe your reaction would be slightly different if you were reading the forum and saw "Gesink down, will he get back up." :rolleyes:

people do it all the time, I guarantee I wouldn't go off at another member, who clearly made a mistake. that is imho pathetic.

My reaction would be...

...phewwww :D and/or is gesink ok? :(

fyi your ban was ridiculous also.