2011 Tour de France Stage 18 - Pinerolo - Galibier Serre-Chevalier 200.5km

Page 109 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jul 7, 2010
27
0
0
DamonAlbarn said:
Wrong decision in my opinion. Of couse 89 is a massive amount but it would:
1) Put out a letter of intent for future races
2) The tour is almost over, so why not flog the lazy ****s?

It would also likely result in a team rebellion and the boycotting of all future ASO events and the establishment of a new rival tour where the teams get a percentage of the TV revenue. Do we really want that?
 
Jul 28, 2009
898
0
0
The people bleating about the rules should read them before banging on about them and making fools of themselves. The rules are designed to accommodate the usual and the unusual. No one could deny that this was an exceptionally hard stage and surprisingly enough whoever made the rules actually thought about that kind of circumstance unlike many ill-informed posters.
 
I don’t understand why some people were ****ed off at Basso and TV because they didn’t pull. There is a reason why they were not pulling. They were hanging on for dear life. I like Cadel, but fans need to be more objective. Sometimes I wonder if some of the forumites don’t ride their bikes. Otherwise they would not be saying that. Especially about TV who is performing above his level. I am sure that Basso would have cooperated if he had the strength, because he has done it in the past, but he didn’t.
 
Jul 2, 2009
2,392
0
0
DamonAlbarn said:
Wrong decision in my opinion. Of couse 89 is a massive amount but it would:
1) Put out a letter of intent for future races
2) The tour is almost over, so why not flog the lazy ****s?

The 20% rule has been around for years and it's been used several times before. It's the reason they all ride in one big group.
 
Feb 28, 2010
1,661
0
0
rata de sentina said:
The people bleating about the rules should read them before banging on about them and making fools of themselves. The rules are designed to accommodate the usual and the unusual. No one could deny that this was an exceptionally hard stage and surprisingly enough whoever made the rules actually thought about that kind of circumstance unlike many ill-informed posters.

+1 and it's not like the good old days when sprinters could get several wins in the first week, and then be on a beach by the beginning of the second. Any non-climber in Paris on Sunday has gone through some serous pain to be there.
 
Jun 21, 2011
322
0
0
Rooboy said:
The only subjective thing about the finish time is how they classify the stage (or if a rider is considered to have been "unlucky" - accident etc.)

Look at pages 35 and 36 of the rules:
http://www.letour.fr/2011/TDF/COURSE/docs/reglement.pdf

The time limits are still estimates based on previous experiences and clearly this stage was harder than Coefficient 3 but not short enough to be given Coefficient 4 status. They don't want to eliminate anyone, nor would I, but time limits have to exist yet there has to be leeway for unfortunate situations or in this case, a stage that was a lot more difficult than they expected.

You have to be a cruel individual to send home half the peloton after 2,500km of racing for missing the time limit of stage more difficult than expected by just two minutes. It's not like they were taking it really easy, some of them would've been digging deeper than Voekler.
 
Apr 17, 2010
296
0
9,030
marioni said:
Why would they go all out? It's not like they were gonna be thrown out of the race if they didnt make the cut, right? :D
It seems this rule serves no purpose as it's selectively applied.

Maybe they were smiling because they thought they had been eliminated and they would not have to ride the Telegraphe, Galibier, Alpe d'Huez combo tomorrow? ;)
 
Jul 30, 2009
1,735
0
0
Wow

Well done A Schleck

Can Tommy V hang on tomorrow?

Gonna be some very tired riders - Frank must be favourite for the stage and it will be decided in the ITT

Tommy V in yellow will beat the Schlecks in ITT I think - will they have enough time?
 
Jul 7, 2010
27
0
0
Ragerod said:
The time limits are still estimates based on previous experiences and clearly this stage was harder than Coefficient 3 but not short enough to be given Coefficient 4 status. They don't want to eliminate anyone, nor would I, but time limits have to exist yet there has to be leeway for unfortunate situations or in this case, a stage that was a lot more difficult than they expected.

You have to be a cruel individual to send home half the peloton after 2,500km of racing for missing the time limit of stage more difficult than expected by just two minutes. It's not like they were taking it really easy, some of them would've been digging deeper than Voekler.

Maybe they need a HC coefficient cut off time? :)
 
Jul 28, 2009
898
0
0
Escarabajo said:
I don’t understand why some people were ****ed off at Basso and TV because they didn’t pull. There is a reason why they were not pulling. They were hanging on for dear life. I like Cadel, but fans need to be more objective. Sometimes I wonder if some of the forumites don’t ride their bikes. Otherwise they would not be saying that. Especially about TV who is performing above his level. I am sure that Basso would have cooperated if he had the strength, because he has done it in the past, but he didn’t.
Yeah, when Basso or Rolland did go to the front they were too slow for Evans liking and he went back to the front. I'm very impressed with Evans climbing this year, I was waiting for him to crack because of the changes in gradients but he really judged his effort perfectly and even had a bit left at the very end.

The demise of AC is actually very bad tactically for Evans. He has been able to rely on others who are within striking distance to do some chasing but now they are falling away.
 
Props to Andy for attacking and making the race today!

Shame that no one could animate the chase and they had to ride tempo, but the wind was a beast and everyone was cooked.

I'm disappointed Contador didn't win, but there will be good racing tomorrow I think!
 
Jul 28, 2010
2,274
0
0
And by the way, the atmosphere on the Galibier was fantastic! Props to Prudhomme, today's stage has got to be close to if not his finest work!
 
Still in a little chock here. Could someone rational describe how Andy became over-night:

*a time-trialist
*a descender
*His all-over-the-day-working dude Montfore increasing the gap versus a Peloton.
*BMC was in disarray, as much as i loved Cadels ride, they begun hard driving, a bit too late, obviously since they thought they would catch them, or at least cut the gap. But that would soon change since one dude was stronger then a whole Peloton combined.
*What did the rest of the bunch do? They´ve just sat there, enjoying the french landscape.

Also very disgusting to see Prudhomme and Merckx cheering, shouting and smiling, covering his back.

I am in a bit of a chock really.
 
Jun 13, 2009
212
0
9,030
No_Balls said:
Still in a little chock here. Could someone rational describe how Andy became over-night:

*a time-trialist
*a descender
*His all-over-the-day-working dude Montfore increasing the gap versus a Peloton.
*BMC was in disarray, as much as i loved Cadels ride, they begun hard driving, a bit too late, obviously since they thought they would catch them, or at least cut the gap. But that would soon change since one dude was stronger then a whole Peloton combined.
*What did the rest of the bunch do? They´ve just sat there, enjoying the french landscape.

Also very disgusting to see Prudhomme and Merckx cheering, shouting and smiling, covering his back.

I am in a bit of a chock really.
I think like others have said, it was Montfort/Leopard-bound Devynens riding hard against Euskaltel/Sorensen and two knackered BMC riders. That's hardly a raging peloton charging in for a sprint finish at the end!
 
No_Balls said:
Still in a little chock here. Could someone rational describe how Andy became over-night:

*a time-trialist
*a descender
*His all-over-the-day-working dude Montfore increasing the gap versus a Peloton.
*BMC was in disarray, as much as i loved Cadels ride, they begun hard driving, a bit too late, obviously since they thought they would catch them, or at least cut the gap. But that would soon change since one dude was stronger then a whole Peloton combined.
*What did the rest of the bunch do? They´ve just sat there, enjoying the french landscape.

Also very disgusting to see Prudhomme and Merckx cheering, shouting and smiling, covering his back.

I am in a bit of a chock really.

Yes it was a masterstroke from Andy. Foxing on the smaller climbs on previous days losing small amounts of time knowing he was going to gain 4 minutes today. Apparently he had been reconning todays stage and undertaking a 60km solo attack into a raging headwind. He even practised looking tired for the last 2km’s. Good effort!
 
May 15, 2009
550
1
0
No_Balls said:
Still in a little chock here. Could someone rational describe how Andy became over-night:

*a time-trialist
*a descender
*His all-over-the-day-working dude Montfore increasing the gap versus a Peloton.
*BMC was in disarray, as much as i loved Cadels ride, they begun hard driving, a bit too late, obviously since they thought they would catch them, or at least cut the gap. But that would soon change since one dude was stronger then a whole Peloton combined.
*What did the rest of the bunch do? They´ve just sat there, enjoying the french landscape.

Also very disgusting to see Prudhomme and Merckx cheering, shouting and smiling, covering his back.

I am in a bit of a chock really.

Monfort was at the back of the breakaway group the whole day, obviously he had something in the tank and he was brilliant.

Andy was always a good descender, but not in a rainy conditions,and the group weren't organized in its chase, for me it's no wonder. Anyway, AS lost time on Cadel on the ascent, which seems logical, otherwise that would be a clinic material.

Re Prudhomme-agreed,very disgusting. I wonder what Phil said today about the performance of the "people's champion".

I was also rooting for AC today but we just have to accept defeat. It is just impossible to do a Giro-Tour these days,it seems.
 
Jul 11, 2010
34
0
0
I think Frank has been pretty strong this year. Unlikely anyone can stay with him all out on a climb. Even Andy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.