2012 Road World Championships, Mens Road Race Maastricht - Valkenburg 267 km 23/09/12

Page 6 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Mar 27, 2011
6,135
7
17,495
JTL would have won this if he was familiar with the course ( lol ). Instead he will not place as well.

Gilbert, Gerrans, Sagan, Valverde/JROD and Boonen look the most likely to win.

I would love for Moser or Inglinsky to go well too.

Most people did not see Gerrans beating Cancellara or GVA in sprints though either. Another Example the first hilltop finish in the Vuelta- Valverde beating JROD.

JROD might not be able to get so much of a gap on the cauberg but in Barcelona in the Vuelta he barely moved his bike and he was close to Gilbert. Besides he is still a favourite because there is a distinct chance he could get the gap. The race should also be quite hard if Spain want to pursue that option.
 
May 9, 2010
11,076
2,545
28,180
the asian said:
Gilbert & Valverde will have to be dropped, can't see him winning a sprint which includes them.
I'd say Gerrans is faster than both.

This year he has outsprinted Meersman, Cancellara, Van Avermaet and Hagen (admittedly slightly uphill). The Gerrans-Valverde battle on Old Willunga Hill this year was very close, but Valverde had a slight advantage on that finish compared to the WC one.

It's probably close in any case. Gilbert was very fast in last year's Tour, I'll give you that.
 
Apr 2, 2010
5,266
441
18,580
Hugo Koblet said:
I'd say Gerrans is faster than both.

This year he has outsprinted Meersman, Cancellara, Van Avermaet and Hagen (admittedly slightly uphill). The Gerrans-Valverde battle on Old Willunga Hill this year was very close, but Valverde had a slight advantage on that finish compared to the WC one.

There was also a flat sprint finish for crucial bonus seconds on stage 2 of the TDU into Stirling.

Result:

1. Clarke - won solo in a breakaway

2. Matthews
3. Gerrans
4. Valverde
5. EBH
6. Friere
7. Van Avermaet


Obviously it's much different to sprinting at the end of a tough 260km worlds course but it shows that Gerrans has plenty of speed, and I'd agree with you that he's just slightly faster than Valverde.
 
Aug 29, 2011
239
0
9,030
Gerrans for the win here. Course suits him perfectly and he's been in better shape than Gilbert all season
 
Jan 20, 2011
5,041
21
17,530
Hugo Koblet said:
I'd say Gerrans is faster than both.

This year he has outsprinted Meersman, Cancellara, Van Avermaet and Hagen (admittedly slightly uphill). The Gerrans-Valverde battle on Old Willunga Hill this year was very close, but Valverde had a slight advantage on that finish compared to the WC one.

It's probably close in any case. Gilbert was very fast in last year's Tour, I'll give you that.


Fair point. Gerrans is in form no doubt about that. But IMO when Gilbert and Valverde are in good form they are better finishers than Gerrans and I do think both are in good form right now( Not at their best but in very good form)
 
Jan 11, 2010
15,619
4,553
28,180
JRanton said:
There was also a flat sprint finish for crucial bonus seconds on stage 2 of the TDU into Stirling.

Result:

1. Clarke - won solo in a breakaway

2. Matthews
3. Gerrans
4. Valverde
5. EBH
6. Friere
7. Van Avermaet


Obviously it's much different to sprinting at the end of a tough 260km worlds course but it shows that Gerrans has plenty of speed, and I'd agree with you that he's just slightly faster than Valverde.
That wasn't a flat sprint. And I remember Gerrans kind of surprised Valverde.

Valverde outsprinted Gerrans on top of Willunga Hill, after all.
 
Aug 20, 2011
976
102
10,180
I am surprised that so few are rating Kolobnev among the favourites for Sunday. He har been on the podium twice in the worlds before, showed in Montreal that his form is good, and the course should suit him. He doesn't win very often, but my clear choise for an outiside bet for a top three finish:D
 
Apr 30, 2011
47,181
29,829
28,180
vladimir said:
I am surprised that so few are rating Kolobnev among the favourites for Sunday. He har been on the podium twice in the worlds before, showed in Montreal that his form is good, and the course should suit him. He doesn't win very often, but my clear choise for an outiside bet for a top three finish:D
I have a little money on him finishing in the top-3 :)
 
Jan 11, 2010
15,619
4,553
28,180
Red Rick said:
Michel Wuyt's said he thinks the Spaniards dug too deep in the Vuelta, he was aiming at Contador, Valverde and Rodriguez. He thought Contador's tt was horrible.

I like the fact that there is some flat after the Cauberg. It totally adds a new dimension to the race. Instead of two kinds of possible winners, there are now three: Riders who want to come back after the Cauberg en win the sprint (Boonen, Freire, Sagan), riders who want to decide the race on the final ascent (Valverde, Gilbert, Rodriguez) and riders who have to attack before that. In the Gold race sprinters wouldn't have that chance to win
Michel Wuyts' predictions are always just wishful thinking. "The Spaniards will be worse than the Belgians because... The Italians will be worse than the Belgians because..." And everyone will be worse than Boonen.

What could work in the Belgians' favour (and to the Spaniards' disadvantage) is the expected crap weather. The predictions vary, some say it will be dry, but they all predict wind.
 
Aug 27, 2012
1,404
385
11,180
rxgqgxnyfz said:
Why do you think he won't?
It's his #1 goal for the season.

Because a provisional list I've seen doesn't have him on it.

The reason I ask is exactly as you say...I think he'll do very well here, if he rides.
 
Jan 20, 2011
5,041
21
17,530
vladimir said:
I am surprised that so few are rating Kolobnev among the favourites for Sunday. He har been on the podium twice in the worlds before, showed in Montreal that his form is good, and the course should suit him. He doesn't win very often, but my clear choise for an outiside bet for a top three finish:D

He's not a favourite to win because He's a favourite to finish 2nd or 3rd:D

Netserk said:
I have a little money on him finishing in the top-3 :)

definitely worth punting.
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
Hugo Koblet said:
I'd say Gerrans is faster than both.

This year he has outsprinted Meersman, Cancellara, Van Avermaet and Hagen (admittedly slightly uphill). The Gerrans-Valverde battle on Old Willunga Hill this year was very close, but Valverde had a slight advantage on that finish compared to the WC one.

It's probably close in any case. Gilbert was very fast in last year's Tour, I'll give you that.

After wheelsucking him the entire time.
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
Hugo Koblet said:
Uh, well of course. What's the point? :confused:

Valverde and Gerrans are pretty similar in this aspect.

And Gerrans is not someone who wins a lot now does he?

Anyway, I don't believe for once Gerrans can hold the wheel of Gilbert, Rodriguez or Valverde if they're in top shape. The Cauberg is not the Poggio.
 
Jun 1, 2011
2,500
0
0
JRanton said:
There was also a flat sprint finish for crucial bonus seconds on stage 2 of the TDU into Stirling.

Result:

1. Clarke - won solo in a breakaway

2. Matthews
3. Gerrans
4. Valverde
5. EBH
6. Friere
7. Van Avermaet


Obviously it's much different to sprinting at the end of a tough 260km worlds course but it shows that Gerrans has plenty of speed, and I'd agree with you that he's just slightly faster than Valverde.

I think a small break will be likely on the second to the last time up the Cauberg or possibly sooner. The chasing favorites will have trouble working together.

At least that's may hope. I think (being completely partial), the US has a very strong team, especially now that Talansky has been added in place of Farrar. Talnsky and Van Garderen could attack alternately and from 16 k out. This could be true of a at least a dozen others. Even a solo effort stands a good chance on this course. Late attacks to rule the day?

The sprinters go up in smoke.:D
 
May 20, 2009
8,934
7
17,495
BillytheKid said:
At least that's may hope. I think (being completely partial), the US has a very strong team, especially now that Talansky has been added in place of Farrar. Talnsky and Van Garderen could attack alternately and from 16 k out. This could be true of a at least a dozen others. Even a solo effort stands a good chance on this course. Late attacks to rule the day?
Keep dreaming dude. :D

rxgqgxnyfz said:
What start list?
The official site doesn't have it.
Official
http://www.uci.ch/includes/asp/getTarget.asp?type=FILE&id=ODA2Nzg
Good one
http://biciciclismo.com/cas/site/noticias-ficha.asp?id=55462
 
Apr 14, 2009
1,704
204
10,880
theyoungest said:
Valverde outsprinted Gerrans on top of Willunga Hill, after all.

Gerrans plainly went too early in that stage and got beaten by inches.

I'd say there's virtually nothing between them in a sprint but maybe a slight edge to Gerrans.
 
Jun 16, 2009
19,654
2
0
The Barb said:
Gerrans plainly went too early in that stage and got beaten by inches.

I'd say there's virtually nothing between them in a sprint but maybe a slight edge to Gerrans.

I would agree. Gerrans has become very quick in those types of sprints. Very fast turn of speed and I wouldn't want to be with him at the finish at all.

In saying that, I think Belgium, Italy and Spain will make the race very hard and therefore I don't see Gerrans featuring if those teams actually make it hard.
 
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
theyoungest said:
What could work in the Belgians' favour (and to the Spaniards' disadvantage) is the expected crap weather. The predictions vary, some say it will be dry, but they all predict wind.

Looks pretty damn cold to me.

3454_10151355259360312_900503764_n.jpg
 
Oct 4, 2011
905
0
0
Got to agree with most, I think Gilbert, gerrans and sagan could play out the finish, Wegmann could be a useful outsider as another who hasnt had a mention at all, Dan Martin who I believe is suited to the course after a good showing in LBL earlier in the year.