- May 26, 2009
- 4,114
- 0
- 0
Ferminal said:You are the one making that judgement, there is nothing the TDU can do about the WT, it is merely part of the system. The UCI is to blame for any problems with the WT, not the organisers of the TDU, ENECO or Montreal/Quebec.
The TDU is a poor event on a number of fronts, devalue the race on this basis, but don't blame it for the problems in the way the cycling season is run by the UCI. The idea that a race organiser would hold its race back from moving up the UCI classification because it might "shame" Tirreno-Adriatico or Liege-Bastogne-Liege is absurd.
I agree that the race shouldn't be WT, not because it would give equal points as Paris-Nice (as this is a separate debate), but because I don't believe it yet has the qualities which should be required to hold a race at the top level. However, I'm not going to take aim at the race and make a mockery of it just because it is WT - this is the UCI's fault. The problems of an individual race organiser are different to those faced/created by the UCI. SA Tourism can't fix the problems in cycling so we shouldn't blame it for them either.
Ok 'importance' was a poor word to use, points would've been better. I can't remember if it was in this thread or another one, but it was said 'they should have different rankings for WT races and points given to the races depend on what ranking it is'.
I have no issue with SA Tourism and am not expecting them to right the wrongs of the sport. As I've said before I'm sure the riders enjoy the weather and the training, I'm sure for most riders it's like a spring training game of baseball.
Yeah I agree the problem is with the UCI and I'm sure they get a nice wedge of ca$h out of the deal. Maybe they should just go back to pre PT/WT system, but they wont.