- Aug 3, 2009
- 1,562
- 0
- 0
SafeBet said:Cuz cycling is a drug and I'm big time addicted.
I even watch Fleche Wallone sometimes.
I even watch the Grand Prix de l'Escaut
SafeBet said:Cuz cycling is a drug and I'm big time addicted.
I even watch Fleche Wallone sometimes.
sultanofhyd said:This categorization of climbs into short, steep, long, steady and whatever else is ridiculous, especially when talking about Contador. He has won/succeeded on all kinds of climbs that exist, from Angliru to Arcalis, Verbier to Ventoux, PdB to Tourmalet, Etna to Zoncolan, Mende to La Zubia.
Red Rick said:It's the climb that decided this race two years ago
It's the climb that provided the oppurtunitie for the biggest raid in GC cycling since l'Aquila
It's the climb nobody seems to care about now
It's Collada de la Hoz![]()
Red Rick said:It's the climb that decided this race two years ago
It's the climb that provided the oppurtunitie for the biggest raid in GC cycling since l'Aquila
It's the climb nobody seems to care about now
It's Collada de la Hoz![]()
LaFlorecita said:Muro di Guardiagrele _O_
roundabout said:Barely dropped Geschke, lost time to Peraud
DominicDecoco said:Cycling fans all over the world seriously need to gather about and tell the Vuelta organisers to quit making these embarrassing routes. This is another day of 198km of absolutely nothing - just like the 13 previous stages..
Red Rick said:The problem that even though the routes were so awfull the past few years, the Vuelta was often the best GT of the year, because the winner wasn't decided after 10 days of racing
As for me,its one of the most important thing how I evaluate 'greatness' of a GT.Liquigas said:A race is not great because of that.
Giro d'Italia 2012 must have been fantastic then...Red Rick said:The problem that even though the routes were so awfull the past few years, the Vuelta was often the best GT of the year, because the winner wasn't decided after 10 days of racing
wirral said:I personally would like the Vuelta to continue in its vein of the 'eccentric' GT with more finishes and routes in unusual and memorable places. Yesterday we had the zoo, we had the racetrack and the monastery. How about a golf course, a bullring (have they had that?) or a multi-storey car park. They are clearly moving in the right direction but they need to get their marketing team brainstorming a bit more. It would be a shame if ASO management involvement resulted in a bland and tepid version of Le Tour (so as not to challenge the real thing).
wirral said:I personally would like the Vuelta to continue in its vein of the 'eccentric' GT with more finishes and routes in unusual and memorable places. Yesterday we had the zoo, we had the racetrack and the monastery. How about a golf course, a bullring (have they had that?) or a multi-storey car park. They are clearly moving in the right direction but they need to get their marketing team brainstorming a bit more. It would be a shame if ASO management involvement resulted in a bland and tepid version of Le Tour (so as not to challenge the real thing).
Of course it is. Because for the organisers in real life there are also other factors to consider. Otherwise we wouldnt have had this stupid course in logronoRed Rick said:I also think that the Vuelta is trying to find its own identity. The Tour is the big, important GT with the long, regular climbs everyone has heard of, cause they use them way too often. The Giro is the GT with the hardes mountains, the longest and most brutal mountain stages. Meanwhile, the Vuelta is trying to be the GT that's always close, lots of stages where small gaps are possible, lots of stages with 2km of spectacle.
Ofcourse it would be best if all the GT's got one of the forum members for a parcours designer, in the race design thread, every GT is better than the real life version