The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Eshnar said:Serious question now. How many years to go until the Strade Bianche will be recognized as a monument? 30? 50? 100?
Ryo Hazuki said:I'm literally ****ing myself from laughter after this comment. good job!
Let's turn it around: If Valverde would peak for Flanders (like Stybar and GVA do), he might have been able to win todayPentacycle said:If Van Avermaet would peak for the Ardennes instead of Flanders he might play a big role on the Cauberg too.
That's very hard for me to believe. Were there cobbles in the Czech national champs? In his vuelta stage? In T-A TTT? In his Tour of Poland stage? In his Tour des Pyr?n?es stage? In his Tour of Slowakia Prologue? In all 3 of his Eneco stages (possible)?Akuryo said:I don't know if anyone already said it, but this was Stybar's first road victory without any cobbles in the race. Gravel is no cobblestone.
Better than LBL? That's definitely a stretch.luckyboy said:It is certainly better than any of the Ardennes races and Gent-Wevelgem.
Akuryo said:I don't know if anyone already said it, but this was Stybar's first road victory without any cobbles in the race. Gravel is no cobblestone.
It is selective because no one is in top form. Just like Omloop is selective as well. If it changed spot with Amstel (and had WT status), it would probably often come down to a large group sprinting for the win with this route.luckyboy said:It's a shame it isn't an older race. We'd have more editions to look back at for a start.
Don't think it really needs to be any longer - it is selective as it is.
It should be WorldTour anyway, it's a very congested time for WT races though. Guess it would be easier to do with the reforms coming in 2017.
It is certainly better than any of the Ardennes races and Gent-Wevelgem.
.DFA123 said:Well it is shorter - it's 1.2km compared with 1.5km for the Cauberg. The Cauberg is quicker for sure, but it's not shorter.
Netserk said:It is selective because no one is in top form. Just like Omloop is selective as well. If it changed spot with Amstel (and had WT status), it would probably often come down to a large group sprinting for the win with this route.
Akuryo said:I don't know if anyone already said it, but this was Stybar's first road victory without any cobbles in the race. Gravel is no cobblestone.
If it wants to be a bigger race and more prestigious, yes.luckyboy said:So it doesn't need to be any longer then
Volderke said:.
Having experience with both, I can tell you that the Cauberg is not 1.5km, unless you count the false flat. Perfectly reasonable thing to do for an armchair cyclist
Akuryo said:I don't know about the Nationals, but the Vuelta stage had cobbles. Only 200 or 300 meters, but still!
Hugo Koblet said:I'd still back Valverde against Stybar on this finish anyday though.
That is a true shame. What incintitive will there now be for Valverde to attack? One could hope that the presence of Gerrans could force him to, or at the very least make sure he would lose if he didn't.Arredondo said:So Gerrans broke his elbow today, in his first race after he recovered from a broken collarbone.