- Feb 20, 2010
- 33,064
- 15,270
- 28,180
Re: Re:
Interesting ≠ likable though. Compelling, perhaps. There are many riders who may be just as reprehensible as Sagan, but haven't had the platform, be it for lack of success or lack of public prominence, to display it. But as and when they do, I'll dislike them, too.
Time may heal the wound, I hated Cipo at the time as well.
pedromiguelmartins said:yes, of course! Mark and Petter are way more interesting than 90% of the others that can't barely read or express what's going on. They have blood and emotions, at least.Libertine Seguros said:Just like Mark Cavendish, you mean?Cance > TheRest said:Atleast he's not trying to hide it. That makes him likeable
Interesting ≠ likable though. Compelling, perhaps. There are many riders who may be just as reprehensible as Sagan, but haven't had the platform, be it for lack of success or lack of public prominence, to display it. But as and when they do, I'll dislike them, too.
Time may heal the wound, I hated Cipo at the time as well.