Re: Re:
Nothing ventured, nothing gained. You call it grandstanding, anyone with a degree of sense would call it trying to win the race, which he came dangerously close to doing. If you can't appreciate the effort it took to do so and weren't in the slightest entertained by it then you have my sympathies.
rick james said:LaFlorecita said:Thomas beat him on two summit finishes with an average gradient of under 6%. That's false flat for Contador and perfect for Thomas. Whenever the gradient got above 8%, Contador gapped him. Are you forgetting he got 28s on Malhão, and yesterday, 30s in 1km?JRanton said:Thomas is great in bad weather and has beaten Contador on 2 summit finishes this season. What makes you assume that Contador would have beaten him on that finish (Thomas was already great on that same climb in 2014 Paris-Nice btw)?
It's almost as if Saturday's stage didn't happen. Thomas responded to two Contador attacks and then counter attacked and dropped him with 300m to go. And of course he comfortably beat him in the prologue too. I'd say he absolutely deserves his Paris-Nice win!![]()
All that attacking and he gets nothing for it...That must hurt, grandstanding for his fans, that's what he is reduced to
Nothing ventured, nothing gained. You call it grandstanding, anyone with a degree of sense would call it trying to win the race, which he came dangerously close to doing. If you can't appreciate the effort it took to do so and weren't in the slightest entertained by it then you have my sympathies.