2016 Tour de France, Stage 3: Granville → Angers (224km)

Page 6 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jun 13, 2016
447
1
0
Re:

hrotha said:
All this talk about solo rides when the real question should be why the breaks are less and less contested.
Too many sprinters that think that they can win? Katusha, Etix, Dimension Data, Tinkoff, Lotto...
 
May 9, 2014
5,230
108
17,680
Today's stage is a great advertisement for cycling. No wonder so many companies are lining up to sponsor teams
 
Aug 31, 2014
257
0
0
Looks like they're pushing for the intermediate sprint.

PROFILSPRINT.png
 
Jun 13, 2016
447
1
0
The tour being the tour, with these amazing stages. At least put some cobbles on it, put it around unprotected areas (wind) so we can have a freaking race. Otherwise, why having a long stage at all?
 
Mar 14, 2016
3,092
7
0
Re:

MacBAir said:
The tour being the tour, with these amazing stages. At least put some cobbles on it, put it around unprotected areas (wind) so we can have a freaking race. Otherwise, why having a long stage at all?
Sprinters need stages too.
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
Re: Re:

CheckMyPecs said:
MacBAir said:
The tour being the tour, with these amazing stages. At least put some cobbles on it, put it around unprotected areas (wind) so we can have a freaking race. Otherwise, why having a long stage at all?
Sprinters need stages too.

Why? Cycling doesn't need sprinters to survive.
 
Oct 23, 2011
3,846
2
0
Re: Re:

CheckMyPecs said:
MacBAir said:
The tour being the tour, with these amazing stages. At least put some cobbles on it, put it around unprotected areas (wind) so we can have a freaking race. Otherwise, why having a long stage at all?
Sprinters need stages too.

Cobbles, wind or even small hills don't stop sprinters from winning races. It just stops Kittel from winning stages, which is a good thing. If you put wind or some moderate cobbles/dirt road/small hills in ever sprinter stage, guys like Cavendish, Griepel etc. can still win races, only they have to work harder and other guys have a chance of beating them.

Degenkolb, Kristoff, Sagan, Demare, Bouhanni etc. all have shown to be good in tricky finales as long as it doesn't include serious climbing.

Even Cavendis and Greipel have won stages with fun finales, but they had to work very hard to be able to contest the sprint, which isn't a problem.

All sprinters who are competing ftw here except Kitte would be able to survive flat stages with a tricky finale giving some chances to attackers. All of them can win in echelons. All of them can get over a few cobbles or a few small hills.
 
May 21, 2010
2,022
838
13,680
as much as people complain about little action,the riders themselves enjoy having an off day on the bike
 
Mar 14, 2016
3,092
7
0
Re: Re:

Maaaaaaaarten said:
CheckMyPecs said:
MacBAir said:
The tour being the tour, with these amazing stages. At least put some cobbles on it, put it around unprotected areas (wind) so we can have a freaking race. Otherwise, why having a long stage at all?
Sprinters need stages too.

Cobbles, wind or even small hills don't stop sprinters from winning races. It just stops Kittel from winning stages, which is a good thing. If you put wind or some moderate cobbles/dirt road/small hills in ever sprinter stage, guys like Cavendish, Griepel etc. can still win races, only they have to work harder and other guys have a chance of beating them.
They already do that in other stages.
 
Jul 2, 2011
3,620
325
14,180
Why is Lotto already riding it's still 44 km to go they'll catch them too soon...
 
Jun 13, 2016
447
1
0
Re:

saganftw said:
as much as people complain about little action,the riders themselves enjoy having an off day on the bike
And they can have as many as they want, outside of competition.
CheckMyPecs said:
Maaaaaaaarten said:
CheckMyPecs said:
MacBAir said:
The tour being the tour, with these amazing stages. At least put some cobbles on it, put it around unprotected areas (wind) so we can have a freaking race. Otherwise, why having a long stage at all?
Sprinters need stages too.

Cobbles, wind or even small hills don't stop sprinters from winning races. It just stops Kittel from winning stages, which is a good thing. If you put wind or some moderate cobbles/dirt road/small hills in ever sprinter stage, guys like Cavendish, Griepel etc. can still win races, only they have to work harder and other guys have a chance of beating them.
They already do that in other stages.
Not enough. Pan flat stages without any sort of difficulty/trouble/interest are waste of time. They don't have a place in these races. Great riders, great sprinters don't need them, too.
 
Nov 7, 2010
8,820
246
17,880
Re: Re:

Maaaaaaaarten said:
CheckMyPecs said:
MacBAir said:
The tour being the tour, with these amazing stages. At least put some cobbles on it, put it around unprotected areas (wind) so we can have a freaking race. Otherwise, why having a long stage at all?
Sprinters need stages too.

Cobbles, wind or even small hills don't stop sprinters from winning races. It just stops Kittel from winning stages, which is a good thing. If you put wind or some moderate cobbles/dirt road/small hills in ever sprinter stage, guys like Cavendish, Griepel etc. can still win races, only they have to work harder and other guys have a chance of beating them.

Degenkolb, Kristoff, Sagan, Demare, Bouhanni etc. all have shown to be good in tricky finales as long as it doesn't include serious climbing.

Even Cavendis and Greipel have won stages with fun finales, but they had to work very hard to be able to contest the sprint, which isn't a problem.

All sprinters who are competing ftw here except Kitte would be able to survive flat stages with a tricky finale giving some chances to attackers. All of them can win in echelons. All of them can get over a few cobbles or a few small hills.

Nonsense. Kittel is the all time record winner of Scheldeprijs. He's fine on moderate cobbles. He's also on Etixx, so will fair way better than most sprinters in the wind. Take off your hater glasses.
 
Jun 13, 2016
447
1
0
Re: Re:

DFA123 said:
Maaaaaaaarten said:
CheckMyPecs said:
MacBAir said:
The tour being the tour, with these amazing stages. At least put some cobbles on it, put it around unprotected areas (wind) so we can have a freaking race. Otherwise, why having a long stage at all?
Sprinters need stages too.

Cobbles, wind or even small hills don't stop sprinters from winning races. It just stops Kittel from winning stages, which is a good thing. If you put wind or some moderate cobbles/dirt road/small hills in ever sprinter stage, guys like Cavendish, Griepel etc. can still win races, only they have to work harder and other guys have a chance of beating them.

Degenkolb, Kristoff, Sagan, Demare, Bouhanni etc. all have shown to be good in tricky finales as long as it doesn't include serious climbing.

Even Cavendis and Greipel have won stages with fun finales, but they had to work very hard to be able to contest the sprint, which isn't a problem.

All sprinters who are competing ftw here except Kitte would be able to survive flat stages with a tricky finale giving some chances to attackers. All of them can win in echelons. All of them can get over a few cobbles or a few small hills.

Nonsense. Kittel is the all time record winner of Scheldeprijs. He's fine on moderate cobbles. He's also on Etixx, so will fair way better than most sprinters in the wind. Take off your hater glasses.

Scheldeprijs is worse than this stage, it proves nothing besides the fact that he is crazy fast while racing in the easiest of the easiest conditions.
 
Jul 25, 2012
12,967
1,970
25,680
Re: Re:

DFA123 said:
Maaaaaaaarten said:
CheckMyPecs said:
MacBAir said:
The tour being the tour, with these amazing stages. At least put some cobbles on it, put it around unprotected areas (wind) so we can have a freaking race. Otherwise, why having a long stage at all?
Sprinters need stages too.

Cobbles, wind or even small hills don't stop sprinters from winning races. It just stops Kittel from winning stages, which is a good thing. If you put wind or some moderate cobbles/dirt road/small hills in ever sprinter stage, guys like Cavendish, Griepel etc. can still win races, only they have to work harder and other guys have a chance of beating them.

Degenkolb, Kristoff, Sagan, Demare, Bouhanni etc. all have shown to be good in tricky finales as long as it doesn't include serious climbing.

Even Cavendis and Greipel have won stages with fun finales, but they had to work very hard to be able to contest the sprint, which isn't a problem.

All sprinters who are competing ftw here except Kitte would be able to survive flat stages with a tricky finale giving some chances to attackers. All of them can win in echelons. All of them can get over a few cobbles or a few small hills.

Nonsense. Kittel is the all time record winner of Scheldeprijs. He's fine on moderate cobbles. He's also on Etixx, so will fair way better than most sprinters in the wind. Take off your hater glasses.
He could probably seriously challenge for MSR and PR if he trained for it as well. People always unfairly put sprinters down.
 
May 25, 2010
8,863
414
18,580
Re:

hrotha said:
All this talk about solo rides when the real question should be why the breaks are less and less contested.

Because the break has no chance on stages like this. More and more teams are bringing a sprinter and they all start playing their sprinter as it's useless to go in the break.
 
Jul 25, 2012
12,967
1,970
25,680
Re: Re:

CheckMyPecs said:
MacBAir said:
The tour being the tour, with these amazing stages. At least put some cobbles on it, put it around unprotected areas (wind) so we can have a freaking race. Otherwise, why having a long stage at all?
Sprinters need stages too.

Yes, it's part of the spectacle and crucially, you can't force GC riders to race every single day.
 
Jun 10, 2010
19,897
2,256
25,680
Re: Re:

Kwibus said:
hrotha said:
All this talk about solo rides when the real question should be why the breaks are less and less contested.

Because the break has no chance on stages like this. More and more teams are bringing a sprinter and they all start playing their sprinter as it's useless to go in the break.
Yes, it's a self-fulfilling prophecy.
 
May 29, 2015
699
0
0
It's fine to have flat stages like this, but I don't understand the need for it to be 223 km.
 
Jan 4, 2011
6,229
241
17,880
Re:

Andro said:
It's fine to have flat stages like this, but I don't understand the need for it to be 223 km.

Check the map. This is pretty much the shortest route from Granville to Angers.
 
Oct 23, 2011
3,846
2
0
Re: Re:

CheckMyPecs said:
They already do that in other stages.

Sure, but that does't refute the point of my post in any way. MaCBair said we should have open areas for wind or cobbles in panflat stages. You responded by saying sprinters need stages too. I responded to you by saying sprinters win stages with echelons and cobbles and even stages with small hills too. The fact that they put obstacles in other stages is completely irrelevant. It's about the necessity of panflat stages without any obstacles and sprinters don't need panflat stages without obstacles, sprinters can win stages with cobbles, echelons and small hills as well. So we don't need stages like today for the sake of providing sprinters with stages where they can compete.

DFA123 said:
Nonsense. Kittel is the all time record winner of Scheldeprijs. He's fine on moderate cobbles. He's also on Etixx, so will fair way better than most sprinters in the wind. Take off your hater glasses.

Not sure if you're being ironic here.......

If you're actually serious, I still won't really argue further because Kittel really has nothing to do with the main point of my post.