I like Gerrans. He was in the top 3-4 puncheurs in the world, a notch below Gilbert but with a better sprint. i.e. more pure talent than given credit for. If you can go with the best puncheurs at the end of classic and nail them in the sprint, why the bloody hell wouldn't you? People don't seem to get that in MSR, only he and Nibbles could go with Canc. Nibbles was cooked, Gerrans played it cool - with the team sprinter and previous winner in the next group - and launched a great sprint. That ain't luck. That's brains, legs and heart in harmony. People that would prefer heart alone, separate from legs and brain, don't get bike racing.
LBL was pretty shitty, but the dude played his only hand and came up trumps. Hate should go to the goats who didn't attack, not the best sprinter who hung on. Credit is due there for hanging on in a race that probably is beyond his abilities. I reckon the WC in Spain was the one race where criticism was really warranted. A few turns there could have been enough, but he bet on Belgium and lost. The again, a few turns might have been enough and maybe GVA would have won the sprint.....
What is comes down to is that people hang him for not being a Sagan or a Merckx. But if he could click a button and inherit those genetics, what do you reckon he would do? Ergo, why hate someone for not having superstar genetics and riding in full awareness of that reality?
In sport and life generally, I always prefer the person who makes the most of their more moderate abilities, than the superstars who are born with so much talent that they are streets ahead of the field.