So, latest version of this farce: the jury based their decision on an outdated rule book. They didn't even know there was a new one since this year.
Professionalism at its best.
Professionalism at its best.
It's cycling, what do you expect? It's particularly funny at post tour crits, when they mess up the lap-count, the results, riders being lapped, bunch of *** oafs everywhere you look.Jagartrott said:So, latest version of this farce: the jury based their decision on an outdated rule book. They didn't even know there was a new one since this year.
Professionalism at its best.
But after this last meeting, that doesn't change their ruling? Weird...Jagartrott said:So, latest version of this farce: the jury based their decision on an outdated rule book. They didn't even know there was a new one since this year.
Professionalism at its best.
MatParker117 said:Apparently Sky are going to fire people up La Molina and see what happens.
deValtos said:LaFlorecita said:This reminds me of something Dan Martin pointed out. 50th on GC earns as many WT points as 3rd on a stage with the new system. Way to promote aggressive racing.![]()
While I don't disagree with the content of what Dan Martin is saying ... the fact that he admits he's only just finding about this now kind of implies he (and other riders) never gave much of a care anyways. You'd have to know about it for it to have an effect on you. :lol:
Perhaps it does affect the DS's decisions though.
Mr.White said:LaFlorecita said:Good post. I agree we could still see some battles for stage victories but there's simply no terrain to make up close to or more than a minute on Valverde, especially considering the bonus seconds he can still grab.Zinoviev Letter said:barmaher said:I think the moaning is only justified if the next 5 stages are crap. You guys react way too quickly.
I will admit that it is not a great route, but to write off the rest of the race before it has even happened is not really a good plan.
Lots of people wrote off the final stage in Paris Nice for instance. And the stage in which Tom Dumoulin cracked in the Vuelta. And I guess some people (including me) wouldn't have anticipated Fuente De.
I still hope for a couple of stages to be raced entertainingly for the stage victory. It's not impossible that something exciting could happen in GC, but we are getting towards "and then a giant spider trapped Valverde in her web and everyone on Movistar lost two minutes desperately sawing him free" levels of likelihood.
A minute? BMC is just at 2 seconds, they have 4 guys who could attack Valverde, Sky has 3, maybe even 4 with Nieve. They need to strike tomorrow already, and from far out. Movistar is strong, but it's not TDF Sky team, everything is still open. Even Trek could play Mollema or Pantano card. As far as Contador concerns, well he could try on Lo Port right from the bottom, like Quintana did in Valenciana. He should be the best climber in this race, it's worth a try. Valverde is in pole position, but it's far from over
Given the firepower they have with them, this makes perfect sense. I really hope it happens, it will make for great racing with BMC, Movistar, Trek and the Quickie's (for the Martin stage win) hitting it hard behind. Could be funMatParker117 said:Apparently Sky are going to fire people up La Molina and see what happens.
Valv.Piti said:The moaning in this thread is funny. When we saw the route we knew this would happen. It might not be to everyones liking, especially a certain segment on this forum, but thats just how the route is. It might open up for some other scenarios and lets remember, the race as it was before wasn't exactly riveting racing either with a couple of shallow MTFs and nothing else.
Give it a chance. Maybe this will make for better racing, who knows.
LaFlorecita said:He wasn't joking, there was a meeting between the jury and Movistar and BMC, but it seems they maintained the sanction - 3' for Rojas, 2' for Amador and 1' for Oliveira.GraftPunk said:Felice Gimondi said:New Jury meeting![]()
I honestly can't tell if you are joking or not, my caffeine has worn off.
HelloDolly said:Valv.Piti said:The moaning in this thread is funny. When we saw the route we knew this would happen. It might not be to everyones liking, especially a certain segment on this forum, but thats just how the route is. It might open up for some other scenarios and lets remember, the race as it was before wasn't exactly riveting racing either with a couple of shallow MTFs and nothing else.
Give it a chance. Maybe this will make for better racing, who knows.
People on here moaned moaned about the Paris Nice route and that turned out to be exciting and unpredictable race
Bet this race will offer up some great racing too
In fact most people on here just look for reasons to moan
The majority of people were excited about the PN route.HelloDolly said:Valv.Piti said:The moaning in this thread is funny. When we saw the route we knew this would happen. It might not be to everyones liking, especially a certain segment on this forum, but thats just how the route is. It might open up for some other scenarios and lets remember, the race as it was before wasn't exactly riveting racing either with a couple of shallow MTFs and nothing else.
Give it a chance. Maybe this will make for better racing, who knows.
People on here moaned moaned about the Paris Nice route and that turned out to be exciting and unpredictable race
Bet this race will offer up some great racing too
In fact most people on here just look for reasons to moan
Ricco' said:I went to the official website to see the classifications and the jury of this race must be the most incompetent that I have ever seen.
In the team classification, they decided to count 3 times the result of this stage (for team time trials, usually the result of the stage is the result of the team classification). The result? For instance BMC is at 6 seconds of the front when they should be at 2 seconds, Sky is at 2'12'' when they should be at 46'' and so on. Caja Rural is at 13'48'' when no team lost that much time. I remember that yesterday all times except Funvic arrived with the same time.
I don't know what this people is doing, really.
I just checked the regulation of the race and the fault is on the organizers who decided to multiply the result of the stage by 3 for the team classifications. So, in practical terms, for that specific competition, we have 9 stages, 3 of which are TTT.![]()
This organizers deserve to have this race demoted to 2.2 or lower.
Jagartrott said:So, latest version of this farce: the jury based their decision on an outdated rule book. They didn't even know there was a new one since this year.
Professionalism at its best.
Armchair cyclist said:Ricco' said:I went to the official website to see the classifications and the jury of this race must be the most incompetent that I have ever seen.
In the team classification, they decided to count 3 times the result of this stage (for team time trials, usually the result of the stage is the result of the team classification). The result? For instance BMC is at 6 seconds of the front when they should be at 2 seconds, Sky is at 2'12'' when they should be at 46'' and so on. Caja Rural is at 13'48'' when no team lost that much time. I remember that yesterday all times except Funvic arrived with the same time.
I don't know what this people is doing, really.
I just checked the regulation of the race and the fault is on the organizers who decided to multiply the result of the stage by 3 for the team classifications. So, in practical terms, for that specific competition, we have 9 stages, 3 of which are TTT.![]()
This organizers deserve to have this race demoted to 2.2 or lower.
They have indeed used a multiple of three on the gap between teams, but your analysis is quite wrong. In doing this they are simply being consistent with the near-ubiquitous rule of team classifications: take the time of the first three finishers of the team in each stage.
Most races only take the team time (once) for team time trials, and very rarely specify in the race regulations that this is what they will do: the organisers of this race are simply unusual in applying the principles of the teams category to every stage. If any team really considered the team classification in this event a major objective it might be an issue, but I very much doubt that BMC will lodge any objection if they lose that category by 3 seconds.