The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Belly laughRed Rick said:No way Roglic gets 4th in a sprint of this group.
Porte is in there.
More where no one wants to stay in life.Red Rick said:Porte's wheel on a descent is not where you want to be in life Rogla.
That's not even bad for Kirby standardsjohnymax said:Kirby is clueless. Fuglsang for the sprint?
johnymax said:Kirby is clueless. Fuglsang for the sprint?
I know but I can't mention every stupidity he says . Anyway Fuglsang is the 4th fastest in a sprint of this group of five.Red Rick said:That's not even bad for Kirby standardsjohnymax said:Kirby is clueless. Fuglsang for the sprint?
johnymax said:Kirby is clueless. Fuglsang for the sprint?
Even if Bernal 2, Rui Costa 3 and Roglic 4?johnymax said:Roglic should leave an attacker alone out there (Fuglsang now) so he can't lose in any scenario.
Alexandre B. said:Even if Bernal 2, Rui Costa 3 and Roglic 4?johnymax said:Roglic should leave an attacker alone out there (Fuglsang now) so he can't lose in any scenario.
No, as the gap is 6.22sAlexandre B. said:Even if Bernal 2, Rui Costa 3 and Roglic 4?johnymax said:Roglic should leave an attacker alone out there (Fuglsang now) so he can't lose in any scenario.