2018 Innsbruck World Championship Men's Road Race - 259km

Page 31 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Re:

Poursuivant said:
Race was over as soon as they couldn’t drop Valverde over the climb.

I thought so, too. Dumoulin and Woods were pretty cooked, even I could outsprint Bardet. French had the riders but Pinot may have spent more time at the front than he should have.

Overall it was a great race. I was on the edge of my seat the final 20 kms. I would have liked the murito to be a bit less "mur"-like -- we would have had 10 riders in the final km otherwise.
 
Re:

Durden93 said:
Was anyone else listening to the uci commentary? I found it somewhat annoying that they kept talking about Dumoulin. Why would Valverde have been afraid of letting Tom, who was riding full gas and doesn’t have a great sprint, into the finale?
If Dumoulin was fresh (and smart) enough to attack on the opposite barrier full gas, Valverde would have had to respond. Even if the attack didn't stick it could have been enough of a launchpad for Woods or Bardet to get around and beat him.
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
Re: Re:

HelloDolly said:
El Pistolero said:
LaFlorecita said:
Bit disappointed Bardet and Woods were happy to ride to the finish with Valverde

They always ride for second or third place, so why are you surprised? 99% of cyclists are afraid to ride for victory.


Such bollo**s

They were tired ....the course was too much for most riders

Sitting on your arses and saying that :lol:

If they were tired then why did they take over from Valverde? Could've just sitten in his wheel.
 
Jul 22, 2011
695
0
0
Re: Re:

El Pistolero said:
dacooley said:
LOL. Once Don crossed the line, I instantly caught myself thinking that El Pistilero is about to come into the thread and start bi***ing about Valverde and how unfair this outcome is. :D

I'll also laugh at you when criminals hurt you. You must like criminals after all.
Your logic is... not like other people's.
 
Re: Re:

42x16ss said:
movingtarget said:
Red Rick said:
franic said:
DFA123 said:
stunning

'do nothing till sprint'

Obviously
Absolute bs. He was part of the most dangerous move on the climb. Worked hard on the descent and the flat to make sure Alaphilippe had no chance of getting back on. Allowing him to lead the final 2km, confident that he could lead the sprint out and still win.

It was tactically perfect.
99.9% agree. Maybe Bardet could have gone harder if he knew Alaphilippe wasn’t in shape
So heroic to do 2 half arsed pulls to keep back a rider you recked so badly he wouldn't win a sprint in a million years.

Woods and Bardet didn't ride to win. They rode to medal.

The were never going to win a sprint against Valverde or drop him after the climb so what more could they do ?
Attack over the top of him and force a response, even if you don't get away, you take something out of your opponent for a sprint, or reduce the number of riders in the sprint.

See the Roubaix 2016 finale - that was a masterclass from Hayman and Boonen.

As for Valverde, he only did what his opponents let him, and the minimum he needed to. Not his fault.
There Hayman won because of the bike frame and wheels
 
Re: Re:

El Pistolero said:
HelloDolly said:
El Pistolero said:
LaFlorecita said:
Bit disappointed Bardet and Woods were happy to ride to the finish with Valverde

They always ride for second or third place, so why are you surprised? 99% of cyclists are afraid to ride for victory.


Such bollo**s

They were tired ....the course was too much for most riders

Sitting on your arses and saying that :lol:

If they were tired then why did they take over from Valverde? Could've just sitten in his wheel.

Because it is World Championships. 3 medals to be given out. That means you don't let the 4th guy come back easily as all 3 come out with something. They weren't going to beat Valverde in the sprint anyway so might as well assure they get a piece of hardware for themselves
 
Re: 2018 Innsbruck World Championship Men's Road Race - 259k

c7b85b9f9c6663268257bb339436ac97o.png
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
Re: Re:

damian13ster said:
El Pistolero said:
HelloDolly said:
El Pistolero said:
LaFlorecita said:
Bit disappointed Bardet and Woods were happy to ride to the finish with Valverde

They always ride for second or third place, so why are you surprised? 99% of cyclists are afraid to ride for victory.


Such bollo**s

They were tired ....the course was too much for most riders

Sitting on your arses and saying that :lol:

If they were tired then why did they take over from Valverde? Could've just sitten in his wheel.

Because it is World Championships. 3 medals to be given out. That means you don't let the 4th guy come back easily as all 3 come out with something. They weren't going to beat Valverde in the sprint anyway so might as well assure they get a piece of hardware for themselves

So they were riding for second and third place, like I said.
 
Re: Re:

franic said:
42x16ss said:
movingtarget said:
Red Rick said:
franic said:
99.9% agree. Maybe Bardet could have gone harder if he knew Alaphilippe wasn’t in shape
So heroic to do 2 half arsed pulls to keep back a rider you recked so badly he wouldn't win a sprint in a million years.

Woods and Bardet didn't ride to win. They rode to medal.

The were never going to win a sprint against Valverde or drop him after the climb so what more could they do ?
Attack over the top of him and force a response, even if you don't get away, you take something out of your opponent for a sprint, or reduce the number of riders in the sprint.

See the Roubaix 2016 finale - that was a masterclass from Hayman and Boonen.

As for Valverde, he only did what his opponents let him, and the minimum he needed to. Not his fault.
There Hayman won because of the bike frame and wheels
They also made EBH and to a lesser extent Stannard, a non factor in the sprint by forcing them to respond so many times.
 
Re: Re:

damian13ster said:
El Pistolero said:
HelloDolly said:
El Pistolero said:
LaFlorecita said:
Bit disappointed Bardet and Woods were happy to ride to the finish with Valverde

They always ride for second or third place, so why are you surprised? 99% of cyclists are afraid to ride for victory.


Such bollo**s

They were tired ....the course was too much for most riders

Sitting on your arses and saying that :lol:

If they were tired then why did they take over from Valverde? Could've just sitten in his wheel.

Because it is World Championships. 3 medals to be given out. That means you don't let the 4th guy come back easily as all 3 come out with something. They weren't going to beat Valverde in the sprint anyway so might as well assure they get a piece of hardware for themselves
Agreed, except for that they could have beaten Valverde in the sprint. He could have been on his limit, made a tactical blunder, had a mechanical, gone too early or lots of other things. And neither Woods nor Bardet are terrible sprinters; in fact, both are pretty good for climbers, and certainly good enough to take advantage of a tactical error by Valverde (which, lets face it, happen quite often in WCs).
 
Sep 6, 2016
584
0
0
Re: Re:

42x16ss said:
Durden93 said:
Was anyone else listening to the uci commentary? I found it somewhat annoying that they kept talking about Dumoulin. Why would Valverde have been afraid of letting Tom, who was riding full gas and doesn’t have a great sprint, into the finale?
If Dumoulin was fresh (and smart) enough to attack on the opposite barrier full gas, Valverde would have had to respond. Even if the attack didn't stick it could have been enough of a launchpad for Woods or Bardet to get around and beat him.

That’s fair. My thinking was that it would have been unwise for Valverde to ride hard at the front to prevent Dumoulin from joining. His best move imo was to slow down somewhat and rest for the sprint. Even if a bunch of other riders came back he’d still have the best sprint.
 
May 21, 2017
211
0
3,030
Re: Re:

Red Rick said:
Stella0596 said:
Omg Dutch tv just described Valverde as 'a crying old man'
So?

Dutch commentators were rooting for him so hard it wasn't even funny. Calling it justice and all.

Yeah, that why I thought it was weird... because they were so happy and it's such a strange choice of words at that time