No, I didn't, since it was just posted on my timeline.Samamba said:DNP-Old said:
You know that's from last year right?
Spot-ontobydawq said:Bye Bye Bicycle said:Gigs_98 said:I agree that the UCI has to find a solution for the SB, PN debacle.These are basically two races which both suit the same kind of riders. The guys who ride SB can still go to tirreno adriatico but I think paris nice actually suits someone like sagan more. Could you maybe make PN one day shorter? Cause there isn't really any weekend in spring where you could move SB without other date clashes
Shortening a classic stage race like P-N for this overhyped hipster race? You must be kidding. SB can move to the a midweek date without any problem.
SB has moved into the realm where it is the hipsters that see it as an "overhyped hipster race".
That's game over for the others probablyDNP-Old said:The gap between the large leading group of 70 riders widens to 2m 30s in front of the rest of the peloton.
Dekker_Tifosi said:That's game over for the others probablyDNP-Old said:The gap between the large leading group of 70 riders widens to 2m 30s in front of the rest of the peloton.
I think it's the gap to the breakaway, not between two pelotons.DNP-Old said:The gap between the large leading group of 70 riders widens to 2m 30s in front of the rest of the peloton.
There is no breakaway. The group of 70 is the 'breakaway'.Vroome.exe said:I think it's the gap to the breakaway, not between two pelotons.DNP-Old said:The gap between the large leading group of 70 riders widens to 2m 30s in front of the rest of the peloton.