Declining upwardsI would also like to decline like this.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Declining upwardsI would also like to decline like this.
The only time you will ever see Confidis written anywhere near a winner
In the studio segment before the race started, they were bigging up Cavendish's chances as well.The British on Eurosport expected him to win by the sounds of it
I think that the retaining World Champion is also on the incline..often..his out of the saddle,getting on top of the gear..sewing machine style is complimented by his tiny body being able to generate 10,000 Gigawatts while in the saddle..But it's ok because he is better on the decline
Declining upwards is the new reverse attackingDeclining upwards
Imho it's more like those expectations were surprisingly low, considering the type of the route.
The British on Eurosport expected him to win by the sounds of it
He said he was on good form, though. Next time I'll take his word for it.Showed no form coming into the race though and it was 270km which could easily have been too long for him.
Do you count Emil Axelgaard as one of the "perpetual pessimists"? Do you think today's racing before the second flandrien lap was what one on average could expect?What a surprise that the perpetual pessimists of the forum didn't get it right when they predicted how a sprint would be an unavoidable conclusion to a 280 km race with 42 climbs.
Jasper Stuyven is also one of them.Do you count Emil Axelgaard as one of the "perpetual pessimists"? Do you think today's racing before the second flandrien lap was what one on average could expect?
Or is this an actualist take?
He said he was on good form, though. Next time I'll take his word for it.
Do you count Emil Axelgaard as one of the "perpetual pessimists"? Do you think today's racing before the second flandrien lap was what one on average could expect?
Or is this an actualist take?
Pidcock?Showed no form coming into the race though and it was 270km which could easily have been too long for him.
Thomas Voeckler with the 66.667% success rate on World Championships as a coach.
Do you count Emil Axelgaard as one of the "perpetual pessimists"? Do you think today's racing before the second flandrien lap was what one on average could expect?
Or is this an actualist take?
A lot of people thought it could easily be a reduced bunch sprint, and considering that would've been a good scenario for the main favorite who also happened to have the strongest team backing him in addition to the other road races all having very small gaps and relatively large groups at the finish I don't think it was an outrageiously pessimistic take that a group sprint was likely.A bit, yes (to your first question). I have thought the whole week that a sprint was extremely unlikely, yet so many have been convinced it was the only possible outcome. Red Rick because he said he himself was able to ride up the climbs.
I just never understood that. With all the racing we have seen the last couple of years, it was always going to open up early. And even if I might have expected the Belgians to be stronger than they were (probably Van Aert specifically) and ridden differently, I still didn't see one team being capable of keeping the race together.
I just don't think you can use the four other races to anything because the elite men ride way more aggressively these years than the other classes and have much, much longer to ride.
A lot of people thought it could easily be a reduced bunch sprint, and considering that would've been a good scenario for the main favorite who also happened to have the strongest team backing him in addition to the other road races all having very small gaps and relatively large groups at the finish I don't think it was an outrageiously pessimistic take that a group sprint was likely.
Imola was raced super closed. Innsbruck too (but it's a special case). Likewise for Bergen, really. If the teams had approached today like Bergen, I'm certain it would have been a reduced sprint.A bit, yes (to your first question). I have thought the whole week that a sprint was extremely unlikely, yet so many have been convinced it was the only possible outcome. Red Rick because he said he himself was able to ride up the climbs.
I just never understood that. With all the racing we have seen the last couple of years, it was always going to open up early. And even if I might have expected the Belgians to be stronger than they were (probably Van Aert specifically) and ridden differently, I still didn't see one team being capable of keeping the race together.
I just don't think you can use the four other races to anything because the elite men ride way more aggressively these years than the other classes and have much, much longer to ride.
I guess we can come back to the other idea that circuit WC favor final lap attacks and this route with 2 different laps and with the hardest laps finishing 50km from the line was a good idea.Imola was raced super closed. Innsbruck too (but it's a special case). Likewise for Bergen, really. If the teams had approached today like Bergen, I'm certain it would have been a reduced sprint.
Same!!! It might look sexy on TV but irl no please
And remember Bernal transporting Champagne in his mouth to his gf this giro
Okay, just read Voeckler said that wasn't exactly his plan. Alaphilippe had a free role and could do what he wanted, but actually he did the opposite of what they had planned (don't know what the plan exactly was) by constantly attacking, relied on his instinct.