Giro d'Italia 2023 Giro d'Italia, Stage 19: Longarone – Tre Cime di Lavaredo 183 km (Friday, May 26th)

Page 24 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
With the break taking this one, they will officially have won the majority of the non-TT stages. Fifth Giro in a row with 9+ breakaway wins after a long streak of anything from 3 to 7 (h/t PCS), good indicator of how the race has declined.
I feel opinions like these are very short-termist. In 2018, the winner was better than the Tour winner; in 2019, it was a young Carapaz with Nibali (still good) and the 2019 vuelta winner on the pdium, the tour had Bernal in a pretty low-quality year;

It's really been since COVID that the field quality has dropped. But even then, the Tour has not been crazy ahead: in 2020, it was Pogi's first go, but Roglic second. Then Carapaz/Thomas podiuming with the two GT stars (Pogacar and Vingegaard) first. And this year, you had Roglic, Thomas, Remco, Tao - a Giro winner, a Tour winner, and two Vuelta winners. Basically the entire second tier of GT riders, except Carapaz and Bernal. I feel like the very, very best going to the Tour was normal in the mid 2010s - Froome didn't do the Giro until 2018!

Is it more a mark of the GC/GT world stage, rather than just the Giro? Roglic has been the #3 GT rider in the world over the past few years, and a triple Vuelta winner. Thomas was 3rd at the Tour last year, Carapaz the year before. Is the issue also that between Ineos and Jumbo Visma, you have two defensive teams and two defensive riders? And that there's an obsession with last day finishes over good racing? 8 years ago, Almeida was replaced by Aru and a crazy Astana team. Roglic was Nibali in 2016, who forced his team to work like crazy until he was set up to win.

There's also a bit of a lack of third-tier GT riders across world cycling, and also a lack of bravery/aggression. There's no long range attempts as in the 2000s, and all the issues of the past ten years are just stronger.
 
I feel opinions like these are very short-termist. In 2018, the winner was better than the Tour winner; in 2019, it was a young Carapaz with Nibali (still good) and the 2019 vuelta winner on the pdium, the tour had Bernal in a pretty low-quality year;

It's really been since COVID that the field quality has dropped. But even then, the Tour has not been crazy ahead: in 2020, it was Pogi's first go, but Roglic second. Then Carapaz/Thomas podiuming with the two GT stars (Pogacar and Vingegaard) first. And this year, you had Roglic, Thomas, Remco, Tao - a Giro winner, a Tour winner, and two Vuelta winners. Basically the entire second tier of GT riders, except Carapaz and Bernal. I feel like the very, very best going to the Tour was normal in the mid 2010s - Froome didn't do the Giro until 2018!

Is it more a mark of the GC/GT world stage, rather than just the Giro? Roglic has been the #3 GT rider in the world over the past few years, and a triple Vuelta winner. Thomas was 3rd at the Tour last year, Carapaz the year before. Is the issue also that between Ineos and Jumbo Visma, you have two defensive teams and two defensive riders? And that there's an obsession with last day finishes over good racing? 8 years ago, Almeida was replaced by Aru and a crazy Astana team. Roglic was Nibali in 2016, who forced his team to work like crazy until he was set up to win.

There's also a bit of a lack of third-tier GT riders across world cycling, and also a lack of bravery/aggression. There's no long range attempts as in the 2000s, and all the issues of the past ten years are just stronger.
I'm not talking about field quality, I'm talking about the racing. 2015-2018 was a series of good to fantastic years. 2019-2021 was already a step down on the whole, then now we've had a very bad and an atrocious edition back to back. The growing apathy in the Giro pelotons is reflected by both that and the number of breakaway wins rising sharply.
 
  • Love
Reactions: ZamlinusYoutubeious