I‘m sure his mood has dropped from miserable to even more miserable.what a bummer for Hart to loose that much time after such a great ITT
I‘m sure his mood has dropped from miserable to even more miserable.what a bummer for Hart to loose that much time after such a great ITT
If he goes from grumpy to livid, Tao hopefully turns into some sort of red hulk in the mountains!I‘m sure his mood has dropped from miserable to even more miserable.
I had to do some very challenging math this morning (Ciccone mate
There's the breakthrough we spent all spring waiting for!
Crashing others intentionally? I wouldn’t consider that any teams mentality, let alone Alpecin’s.Groves already got that Alpecin mentality.
what a bummer for Hart to loose that much time after such a great ITT
Yes, but apparently he didn't want to comment on what happened, only on his feelings.Now, before we crucify Groves on the altar of internet forum scrutiny, it would be prudent to let him say something about what happened.
Maybe now he will be allowed to go in a break!It's 19 seconds...
Groves does not deserve to be accused like that.
There were many things happening, things to consider, that lead to this crash. He is not solely to blame.
I think it would have been wiser not to comment on it immediately after the race or at least taken some time to look at some pictures before making a statement like that against another rider. He is pretty fast to point the finger and yell at other riders. It is not a very good trait imo.
But the itt this year is about twice as long as last year...Well, we have significant damage in the GC for many top 10 aspirants after a relatively short ITT and a sprint stage. For comparison, this was the result after 2 days last year (1 sprint + 1 ITT):
10th 18s
20th 28s
50th 38s
All of the speculation about cause of crash is not relevant to a disqualification. As a rider who took his hands off the bars who had the lead position; he would face relegation at least or expulsion based on the consequences of the action. Ballerini was holding his line. If the road narrows it's the obligation of the following rider to adjust; not the lead rider who lacks eyes in the back of his head.So to resume about the crash:
The Alpecin rider (Groves) pushes Ballerini. He pushed Ballerini to make space, and given the distance from the finish, that push was probably more to keep himself safe from being boxed in by Ballerini on the right, and the barriers on his left. Those barriers were not very safe with their legs sticking out approx. half a meter. Still, a push is not something you should do unless it is for the safery of both of the riders, and if there is no alternative (I reckon braking was possible but would obviously lose him positions).
Ballerini going left creates a wave of riders going left, and while most riders avoid crashing as there still was some space to move, the DSM rider (Tusveld)? was too slow to react and crashed. Tusveld looked back just before the wave came his way, so he didn't have time to react.
So who is to blame?
Groves maybe in the first place, but there maybe is a good reason why he pushed (to avoid crashing himself in the barriers).
The race director is responsible for safe barriers, and those are not up to standard (post Tour de Pologne / Jakobsen).
Tusveld has to look ahead instead of looking behind. While he wasn't responsible for the swerving, there was still some space to avoid crashing if he looked ahead.
All of the above is only meant to illustrate how quick we are to judge, and that reality is, in many cases, not black / white.
First, Ackermann was thought to be the responsable for swerving, next it was Tusveld's fault for not being able to avoid the swerving while looking back, and last it was Groves who, at this moment, is seen as a dirty rider that tried to create danger for no reason.
Now, before we crucify Groves on the altar of internet forum scrutiny, it would be prudent to let him say something about what happened.
The forum doesn't care much about sprint stages which are a necessary annoyance. It only really cares about GC - the fight for pink. In the forum's eyes Groves risked destroying three weeks of entertainment wondering if Roglic can beat Remco fair and square. Someone must pay!!that push was probably more to keep himself safe from being boxed in by Ballerini on the right, and the barriers on his left. Those barriers were not very safe with their legs sticking out approx. half a meter. Still, a push is not something you should do unless it is for the safery of both of the riders, and if there is no alternative (I reckon braking was possible but would obviously lose him positions).
The problem is that Ballerini's front wheel was to the left of the rider in front of him's back wheel. So when Groves pushed him there was a huge probability of Ballerini crashing, because his front wheel was clipping behind the backwheel of the rider in front of him. It's a miracle Ballerini didn't crash himself, because had he, he would have taken out Evenepoel and Roglic in one swoop.So to resume about the crash:
The Alpecin rider (Groves) pushes Ballerini. He pushed Ballerini to make space, and given the distance from the finish, that push was probably more to keep himself safe from being boxed in by Ballerini on the right, and the barriers on his left. Those barriers were not very safe with their legs sticking out approx. half a meter. Still, a push is not something you should do unless it is for the safery of both of the riders, and if there is no alternative (I reckon braking was possible but would obviously lose him positions).
Ballerini going left creates a wave of riders going left, and while most riders avoid crashing as there still was some space to move, the DSM rider (Tusveld)? was too slow to react and crashed. Tusveld looked back just before the wave came his way, so he didn't have time to react.
So who is to blame?
Groves maybe in the first place, but there maybe is a good reason why he pushed (to avoid crashing himself in the barriers).
The race director is responsible for safe barriers, and those are not up to standard (post Tour de Pologne / Jakobsen).
Tusveld has to look ahead instead of looking behind. While he wasn't responsible for the swerving, there was still some space to avoid crashing if he looked ahead.
All of the above is only meant to illustrate how quick we are to judge, and that reality is, in many cases, not black / white.
First, Ackermann was thought to be the responsable for swerving, next it was Tusveld's fault for not being able to avoid the swerving while looking back, and last it was Groves who, at this moment, is seen as a dirty rider that tried to create danger for no reason.
Now, before we crucify Groves on the altar of internet forum scrutiny, it would be prudent to let him say something about what happened.
I'm sure this will make Remco even more popular in the peloton. No one's said it, but that counterpoint would be that Quickstep, Jumbo and Ineos are the teams most responsible for making things more dangerous by fighting for position on every flat stage and adding to the congestion. I understand why they do it, but you can't get involved in the fight and then go pointing fingers.Move over Roglic and Fred Wright. We have a new GC guy vs sprinter battle.
Evenepoel blames Groves for Giro d'Italia crash, Alpecin defend Australian sprinter
Kaden Groves ‘did not feel he did anything wrong’ say team after stage 2 pileup disrupted finish
![]()
Evenepoel blames Groves for Giro d'Italia crash, Alpecin defend Australian sprinter
Kaden Groves ‘did not feel he did anything wrong’ say team after stage 2 pileup disrupted finishwww.cyclingnews.com