Bonus seconds at the sprint at the base of the descent plus 10 seconds at the finish, might tempt some GC guy to go for it. Ineos, I would guess.They do have a Pavlovian reaction to climbs.
Should we start a "Quaranta is the Newest Quaranta" thread?I know Fabio Quaranta isn‘t winning on any stage because who tf is Fabio Quaranta,
but Ivan Quaranta, or his son Samuele for that matter, aren‘t winning either. I definitely approve of this stage design as well.
done. Maybe I still had the old profile when I was writing this.In the technical overview it says the last climb is @ 29.5 km to go and I count 26 Km. Not a big deal but could be corrected.
How about Milan again? Was really impressed by his climbing in Saudi Tour this year, or is this climb maybe to long if they drill it for Pedersen/Matthews.I can't imagine any GC guy trying anything. Should be between the likes of Matthews, Cort, Pedersen and Albanese
In my opinion, many teams made the (correct) reasoning that today with an acceleration on the last two climbs the chance of a successful action is not zero (while is zero with a long haul action), so it is better to keep the energies for the final partI don't understand why more teams haven't send riders into the breakaway. Tagliani and Pellaud are deeply missed.
Maybe today is better 1 hr before finishTime to switch off this stage, then switch back on for the last half hour.
Why are Jayco pacing at the front when there is no certainty Matthews will get over the final climbs - I hope they have a back up plan.
because he is not in the same shapeMatthews who won in Mende why should not be able to pass the final climbs ??
And it was from a break. Totally different scenario.
because he is not in the same shape
When did breaks become so completely irrelevant?