I vomit a little in my mouth every time I hear the word "proper" being ascribed to a ridiculously long ITT that would almost singlehandedly decide a race.
Yet it seems ridiculous to say that Remco could take more than a couple of minutes (three max) out of Pogacar or Vingegaard.
What's a ridiculously long ITT? Because i think sub 25km TT's have no place in a GT unless it's MTT. Just like a 100km stage has no place in a GT unless it's filled with HC climbs. So if people want to use the word "proper" for that, then i think that's fair, given the recent bullcrap TT's we've been seeing the past few years.
As for the insane Pog/Vinge/Rev debate, why is everyone acting as if every TT is the same? Results could differ greatly depending on length, parcours, etc. Evenepoel finished 7 seconds behind Küng at the WCC, but he mopped the floor with him in Algarve putting him back a cool minute. Pogacar was dominant in 2 TDF TT's but is a non-factor outside of the Tour. Vingegaard has never even won a TT and has 4 podiums out of 20 TT's he's done, even though he's always been decent/good. Evenepoel has 24 TT's, won 9 and finished on the podium 18 times. And 4 out of 6 of those where he didn't, were from the first season after his crash. At the olympics he finished way behind guys he has beaten multiple times, yet beat Foss, the new WC TT, by over 2 and a half minutes.
If there would be 100km of TT in a TDF, Evenepoel could take anywhere from 30 seconds to 4 minutes out of his rivals. Depending on route and how the TT's are cut up.