pastronef said:
http://www.biscuittinmedia.com/alejandro-marque-cortisone-confusion-tour-of-portugal-2013/
Do you see how that works? You can take corticosteroids (Synacthen, Kenacort, Decadron and the rest) and charge up like a mule while you train between races. And if an anti-doping team rock up and demand an out of competition sample, well, no worries, you pee freely. Does that make sense to anyone outside of Wada?...
More than you would ever want to know, but here it is anyway.
Two things with this observation:
#1 WADA is implementing a steriod module to the APMU.
http://www.wada-ama.org/en/Science-.../Question--Answers-on-ABP---Steroidal-Module/
Now, just like the simple Testosterone test, are the underlying tests easily defeated? Will event organizers and sports federations pay for the hard-to-defeat tests? I don't know. As always, you've got the sports federation managing positives anyway, so...
#2 Not sure why it's taken this long for the blogger to come to this realization, but, that's the essence of the weakness of the bio-passport. It was built into the entire system from the start.
####################
There are major physiological changes/consequences/complications to using steroids. Which is why the body builders talk about post-cycle routines in the old days. They don't work *that* great for endurance athletes. Their anecdotal use in grand tours is a rider will have a good day, then the consequences of the steroids kicked in and they were only capable of barely making the time cutoff.
Now, most are off plain old steroids and onto peptides where they get much, not all, of the steroid effect without all the post-cycle complications/consequences. My understanding is peptides are relatively simple to manufacture as compared to steroids too. It's a real scientific breakthrough. The hard work is identifying the peptides.