• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

53rd Amstel Gold Race - 260km

Page 2 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
He was lucky that they gave him 10-15 seconds. But both van Aert and Stuyven couldn't get close to him and afterwards even when the elite group was fully cooperating his lead was extending, only when Terpstra was leading on the cobbles did the gap decrease.
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
Visit site
Re:

Netserk said:
Sagan was far stronger than Greg last year, and would have won both Ronde and Roubaix if not for bad luck. All part of the game.
Naesen had more bad luck last year in roubaix and still finished ahead of sagan. Greg would've also won the ronde if sagan didn't make him crash.
 
Re:

Bardamu said:
He was lucky that they gave him 10-15 seconds. But both van Aert and Stuyven couldn't get close to him and afterwards even when the elite group was fully cooperating his lead was extending, only when Terpstra was leading on the cobbles did the gap decrease.
He was lucky as well that this season is the weakest field of Cobbled Classics riders there has been since the 1940s. Most of the contenders these days are both physically and mentally lacking.
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
Visit site
Re:

Bardamu said:
He was lucky that they gave him 10-15 seconds. But both van Aert and Stuyven couldn't get close to him and afterwards even when the elite group was fully cooperating his lead was extending, only when Terpstra was leading on the cobbles did the gap decrease.
Lol dude that were 30 seconds, not 10. Dillier also did q lot of work when he shouldn't have. Sagan couldn't drop someone who had been in the break for 190km. He wasn't as strong as some of you seem to think.
 
Re: Re:

El Pistolero said:
Bardamu said:
He was lucky that they gave him 10-15 seconds. But both van Aert and Stuyven couldn't get close to him and afterwards even when the elite group was fully cooperating his lead was extending, only when Terpstra was leading on the cobbles did the gap decrease.
Lol dude that were 30 seconds, not 10. Dillier also did q lot of work when he shouldn't have. Sagan couldn't drop someone who had been in the break for 190km. He wasn't as strong as some of you seem to think.
He was probably stronger than everyone else, though. And it doesn't matter who's the strongest, he won.

Mr #StriveForFive will get one step closer to his dream next sunday, mark my words
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
Visit site
Re: Re:

Brullnux said:
El Pistolero said:
Bardamu said:
He was lucky that they gave him 10-15 seconds. But both van Aert and Stuyven couldn't get close to him and afterwards even when the elite group was fully cooperating his lead was extending, only when Terpstra was leading on the cobbles did the gap decrease.
Lol dude that were 30 seconds, not 10. Dillier also did q lot of work when he shouldn't have. Sagan couldn't drop someone who had been in the break for 190km. He wasn't as strong as some of you seem to think.
He was probably stronger than everyone else, though. And it doesn't matter who's the strongest, he won.

Mr #StriveForFive will get one step closer to his dream next sunday, mark my words
AGR is not part of the 5 Monuments...
 
Re: Re:

Brullnux said:
El Pistolero said:
Bardamu said:
He was lucky that they gave him 10-15 seconds. But both van Aert and Stuyven couldn't get close to him and afterwards even when the elite group was fully cooperating his lead was extending, only when Terpstra was leading on the cobbles did the gap decrease.
Lol dude that were 30 seconds, not 10. Dillier also did q lot of work when he shouldn't have. Sagan couldn't drop someone who had been in the break for 190km. He wasn't as strong as some of you seem to think.
He was probably stronger than everyone else, though. And it doesn't matter who's the strongest, he won.

Mr #StriveForFive will get one step closer to his dream next sunday, mark my words
How is that possible when the two races he needs have already happened?
 
Re: Re:

jaylew said:
Brullnux said:
El Pistolero said:
Bardamu said:
He was lucky that they gave him 10-15 seconds. But both van Aert and Stuyven couldn't get close to him and afterwards even when the elite group was fully cooperating his lead was extending, only when Terpstra was leading on the cobbles did the gap decrease.
Lol dude that were 30 seconds, not 10. Dillier also did q lot of work when he shouldn't have. Sagan couldn't drop someone who had been in the break for 190km. He wasn't as strong as some of you seem to think.
He was probably stronger than everyone else, though. And it doesn't matter who's the strongest, he won.

Mr #StriveForFive will get one step closer to his dream next sunday, mark my words
How is that possible when the two races he needs have already happened?
#StriveForFive Amstel Golds, obviously.

Wasn't that the intention? All five monuments seems like a bit of a stretch, especially when he spends one not attacking and the other one is one he's only ever raced twice, and is clearly not suited to him.
 
Re: Re:

GP Blanco said:
Bot. Sky_Bot said:
I hope anybody but Valverde.

I will grant him this race because he never won it on the condition he will not win fleche wallonie and liege.


LOL, He's wanting the Ardennes triple, however of the 3 this is the least likely for him to target and he's stated this is one much more complicated for him to win. He said before the start of the season that if he could only win one race this year what would he want and his response was he wanted that 5th Liege. Then said if I can get my 5th Liege I may as well get another Fleche Wallone to go with it.
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
Visit site
Re: Re:

SKSemtex said:
El Pistolero said:
Netserk said:
Sagan was far stronger than Greg last year, and would have won both Ronde and Roubaix if not for bad luck. All part of the game.
Naesen had more bad luck last year in roubaix and still finished ahead of sagan. Greg would've also won the ronde if sagan didn't make him crash.

Very bad trolling. :lol:
Except it's true. Mate you were practically crying all season about sagan's performance, so don't get cocky now. He couldn't drop someone who was in the early break.
 
This will be a great race, Im pretty sure. All of the best classic riders are pretty much targeting this one and on this route, we will actually get to see some great racing! Hoping it will be more unpredictable than the cobbled monuments this year towards the end of the race.

Have no clue how who will win. Valverde is in great shape, but so has he been before and hasn't managed to win. Im not holding my breath here, but I think he have pretty good chances.

El Pistolero said:
Flamin said:
Netserk said:
Sagan was far stronger than Greg last year, and would have won both Ronde and Roubaix if not for bad luck. All part of the game.

Based on what exactly?? :confused:
Fanboyism.
Agree. Greg was the strongest last spring, marginally stronger than Sagan and Gilbert.
 
Re: Re:

El Pistolero said:
SKSemtex said:
El Pistolero said:
Netserk said:
Sagan was far stronger than Greg last year, and would have won both Ronde and Roubaix if not for bad luck. All part of the game.
Naesen had more bad luck last year in roubaix and still finished ahead of sagan. Greg would've also won the ronde if sagan didn't make him crash.

Very bad trolling. :lol:
Except it's true. Mate you were practically crying all season about sagan's performance, so don't get cocky now. He couldn't drop someone who was in the early break.

Me? Crying about his performance? Please enlight me, when?

Please let me know how could GVA win last year RVV. If Sagan did not crash he would be second best. Either they would not have caught Gilber or he would be dropped like a stone on Paterbaerg. His only chance would be if Sagan killed himself to tow him to the Gilbert. He rode like a coward waiting for Sagan till he starts chasing and then just sitting on his wheel until the crash. His win in PR was again only the luck with Petereš bad luck.
End of story.
 
Mar 15, 2016
520
0
0
Visit site
Re: Re:

El Pistolero said:
SKSemtex said:
El Pistolero said:
Netserk said:
Sagan was far stronger than Greg last year, and would have won both Ronde and Roubaix if not for bad luck. All part of the game.
Naesen had more bad luck last year in roubaix and still finished ahead of sagan. Greg would've also won the ronde if sagan didn't make him crash.

Very bad trolling. :lol:
Except it's true. Mate you were practically crying all season about sagan's performance, so don't get cocky now. He couldn't drop someone who was in the early break.

GvA couldn't catch the same rider either.

What failures the both of them are, except one got the cobble and the top step of the podium in the end.