71st Tour de Romandie - April 25th-30th

Page 7 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
The Barb said:
Thanks for posting that profile - so much easier than I thought. Colbrelli could totally take this stage.
Orica and Trek will ride hard to get rid off him. He is the fastest on paper since Viviani is very unlikely to survive.

Let's see if he can hang on. I also expect some attacks.
 
as I mentioned, they are not doing those corners they did in the Dauphine, so it's not technical at all. The stage finishes on the main road, right there (or maybe a ~100m further down the road) where they went right 4 years ago.

Morabito lives nearby and he said he expects a group of ~30 or so at the finish. Could be about right I guess
 
Not exactly sure why people expect a bunch sprint here. Yes, it may end with reduced group sprinting on the last kilometer but it's not for Colbrelli for sure and I seriously doubt Albasini can survive it. After all, it's almost 15km of climbing and apart from Saturday's stage it's the only one where you can make a difference. I expect many GC guys to attack but it may not stick so Pantano or even Felline may win but it could also end with Froome/Porte/Zakarin/Spilak sprint.
 
Re:

alexix7 said:
Hello! Please, has someone some good profile of the final climb Champery ? I would really like to look into it more properly. Thank you very much !

Champery_Monthey_profile.jpg
 
porte, froome. zaka will be having a really hard time trying to distance roglic, felline and izaguirre on these junior climbs. sunday's time trial will be crucial. I don't think this type of course allows to create the gaps on so-called mountain stages.
 
Re:

Valv.Piti said:
I actually like these type of climbs, they are very open. I know its harder today, but last year's stage in the Dauphine won by Herrada was great fun, a lot of riders can do well.
Yeah. Softer climbs are often more fun to watch.

It's more open with a large list of potential winners depending on the situation. If it was a hard climb, we would know about the outcome before the stage was raced.
 
I think people underestimate today's climb a bit. There are longish parts where gradient is not that low. If the best climbers will do their best to drop others, they will be able to IMO.

For example we have 3kms with 7.8% average near the bottom of the climb.
 
Re:

Anderis said:
I think people underestimate today's climb a bit. There are longish parts where gradient is not that low. If the best climbers will do their best to drop others, they will be able to IMO.
Problem is that the hardest gradients are in the bottom. Then it's followed by some false flat in the mid section where you can recover and the final 3k are like 4-5%. It's really hard (if not impossible) to drop most riders on those gradients from pacing but you can attack and stay away.
 
Re:

Anderis said:
I think people underestimate today's climb a bit. There are longish parts where gradient is not that low. If the best climbers will do their best to drop others, they will be able to IMO.

For example we have 3kms with 7.8% average near the bottom of the climb.
That is the reason why people are suggesting power climbers that can sprint as opposed to sprinters!
 

Latest posts