- Jul 16, 2010
- 17,455
- 5
- 0
roundabout said:Hey, what's wrong with Mosquera as a GT rider? He managed i think 4 consecutive top-5 finishes in the Vuelta before getting semi-busted.
Nothing, I can just think of a lot better climbers than Mosquera.
roundabout said:Hey, what's wrong with Mosquera as a GT rider? He managed i think 4 consecutive top-5 finishes in the Vuelta before getting semi-busted.
El Pistolero said:Even Joaquim Rodriguez has recently said he probably rather wins a real Ardennes classic than his very own Vuelta. I just don't rate the Vuelta that high. Never will.
El Pistolero said:Nothing, I can just think of a lot better climbers than Mosquera.
El Pistolero said:Nothing, I can just think of a lot better climbers than Mosquera.
The Hitch said:But Gilbert is not one of them.
The Hitch said:What the **** has that got to do with anything? We are discussing whether Gilbert can win the Vuelta and you come up with " Me and Joaquim Rodriguez dont rate the Vuetla very high". Are you confused or deliberately trolling?
You dont rate the Vuelta ergo Gilbert can win? How does that work?
You dont rate the 2012 Olympic road race either. Does that mean Contador can win that?
But Gilbert is not one of them.
Gilbert will never be able to follow the Mosquera type up something like the Bola del Mundo. He just doesn't have the build for it, and he needs to change his style of racing (smaller gears, higher cadence).El Pistolero said:Not right now hence I said if he really wanted to focus on becoming a GT rider he could win the Vuelta.
El Pistolero said:Not right now hence I said if he really wanted to focus on becoming a GT rider he could win the Vuelta.
The Hitch said:So the purpose of the paragraph about how you dont rate the Vuelta very high was....
El Pistolero said:that most of the cyclists do the same hence the Vuelta will never have the strong fields you see in the Giro or the Tour(or the stars have already done the for mentioned GTs and are on the way down in their peak form)
If Peter Velits can come third in his first Vuelta(and will be second) than it's not impossible to imagine Gilbert could one day do well in a GC of the Vuelta in a weak field(like last year with Anton crashing out, Schleck still suffering from his injuries, etc) with no real mountainous stages à la Angliru.
Will he have to change his style, body and program? Obviously. I said he could, not he would or he will.
Would it be a surprise? Yeah, kinda like Jalabert in 1994/1995, Damiano Cunego in 2004 or Di Luca in 2007 or Armstrong in 1998/1999. Do I want him to win a GT? No, not really. For clinical reasons that is.
The Hitch said:Hang on a sec. I remember you saying in a very similar situation, that Valverde (whose actually contested big bunch sprints many times), would not be able to take on Cav and Farrar in bunch sprints if he dropped the climbing the tting and all that and focused only on sprints.
Yet you believe that Gilbert, whose never even shown anything in either hc mountains nor tts, would be able to become a gt rider?
El Pistolero said:that most of the cyclists do the same hence the Vuelta will never have the strong fields you see in the Giro or the Tour(or the stars have already done the for mentioned GTs and are on the way down in their peak form)
If Peter Velits can come third in his first Vuelta(and will be second) than it's not impossible to imagine Gilbert could one day do well in a GC of the Vuelta in a weak field(like last year with Anton crashing out, Schleck still suffering from his injuries, etc) with no real mountainous stages à la Angliru.
Will he have to change his style, body and program? Obviously. I said he could, not he would or he will.
Would it be a surprise? Yeah, kinda like Jalabert in 1994/1995, Damiano Cunego in 2004 or Di Luca in 2007 or Armstrong in 1998/1999. Do I want him to win a GT? No, not really. For clinical reasons that is.
La Pandera said:the ridiculous Hincapie for the Tour in 2006, only the blind faithful are believers.![]()
El Pistolero said:Gilbert took the Vuelta as prep, so his time losses don't mean that much. And I never said he should do it, I just said he could do it.
Actually surprised someone as crappy as Velits could get second in Vuelta. Yeah, he will improve and he did good for his age, but it never the less was crappy.
beer_thirty said:Sorry to go briefly off topic here, but wasn't that the saddest thing ever? One mountain stage win from a breakaway and somehow magically he was a grand tour contender. Far and away the silliest thing I've ever seen as a cycling fan. I am sure he didn't believe it himself, but utterly amazing how many bought into it.
And now back to our regularly scheduled programming!![]()
movingtarget said:A rider that does better than expected is crappy ? Gilbert is too heavy to handle the mountains well. Gilbert has more chance of winning Roubaix than doing well in any stage race. He can't time trial which does not help.
La Pandera said:We all know, including Gilbert because he has said as much, that he is not nor will he ever be a grand tour contender, so to say that if this and if that is really simply dreaming. Same as the Cancellara contending for the Tour one day or the ridiculous Hincapie for the Tour in 2006, only the blind faithful are believers.![]()
