79th Dwars door Vlaanderen - A travers la Flandre ME (1.UWT) April 2nd 2025

Page 21 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Watching Wout's interview, I just don't get where the hate leveled at him, comes from?

He's not blaming anyone but himself, and said it was his decision to wait to the sprint. He like everyone else thought he would beat Powless, heads up.

The problem is 3 against 1 on a flat finish is p*ss easy tactically. One attacks, Powless follows, another counters and job done. Voilà.
 
Just a question, have the mods or someone forbidden anyone from posting about the forbidden site? It's always cryptic regarding that.
If you ask, I might feel obliged to point out the rules on the top of the forum:
Please don't...
  • Engage in any illegal activity. Asking for help pirating, cracking, or bypassing copyright protection is not allowed.

If nobody asks, I don't need to mention it...
 
  • Wow
Reactions: E_F_
Wout's face looks like he lost some weight. His cheeks look even more sunken than Roglic. Maybe lost some top end power to gain climbing endurance?

GniddK7WcAAAxGB
 
He was completely spun out at the end for sure
Yup. He is saying he cramped, but I think they really need to look at whether shorter cranks are what he needs. There are benefits, but they are not a panacea. And he just continually has been looking undergeared. That could be a knee/strength thing as well, so who knows. And this year could end up being a rebuilding year after nearly destroying his knee. But clearly an odd thing going on.

As for taking the responsibility for going for the sprint, I dunno. It sounds like the car made that call and Wout went along with it, rather than Wout asking for it.
 
The stupidest tactic I've ever seen. When you're 3 against one, you shouldn't just bet on winning a sprint, no matter how good you think Wout is in a sprint. You have to test whether you can run Nilson out of energy first, with the 2 other Visma people, and if that fails, Wout has been saving energy and can decide it in the sprint, where Nilson has spent a lot of energy before.... There's something completely wrong with the sports directors sitting in the Visma car.
 
Ah, the “never work at the front” gripe from the armchair bros.

He’s pulling through in a group of 4. He’s taking short pulls. Not a lot of extra effort, and he’s probably feeling good.

No reason to piss off the other riders with this far to go. He can back off later.

These guys race together for years, and bunch dynamics matter. Not always black and white, the tactics.
This post should really be the subtitle for the entire forum
 
Yeah Tiesj after said they were so focused on winning with Wout because of what happened last year. Big mistake

It's one of the worst screw-up I've seen in a bike race, bar very few. There's just no way you're allowed to lose that one. No offense to Powless. He played his only card and won the jackpot. But Visma... god, what a disaster.

There's no sugar-coating this one. The logical choice for first attacker versus Powless (anywhere in the final 10km's really) would have been Benoot as well. If he breaks free, he wins, if Powless closes him down, then one of the other two can counter - even Van Aert.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CJCycling
The stupidest tactic I've ever seen. When you're 3 against one, you shouldn't just bet on winning a sprint, no matter how good you think Wout is in a sprint. You have to test whether you can run Nilson out of energy first, with the 2 other Visma people, and if that fails, Wout has been saving energy and can decide it in the sprint, where Nilson has spent a lot of energy before.... There's something completely wrong with the sports directors sitting in the Visma car.
Dunno if I'd blame the car. Wout said it was his call, and I believe him. From all we've seen behind the scenes over the years, he carries a LOT of weight on that team, and this is his part of the season.

I mean of course there was some risk, but if your team leader, a guy who usually has a massive sprint, says he's good and wants to sprint for the win, you support him. A few people pointed it out, but even Powless thought he had no chance and was sprinting for second.

Wout made the wrong call. They all recognize it, they all took responsibility to some extent in the interviews. Tough day. Now they face the questions.
 
Dunno if I'd blame the car. Wout said it was his call, and I believe him. From all we've seen behind the scenes over the years, he carries a LOT of weight on that team, and this is his part of the season.

I mean of course there was some risk, but if your team leader, a guy who usually has a massive sprint, says he's good and wants to sprint for the win, you support him. A few people pointed it out, but even Powless thought he had no chance and was sprinting for second.

Wout made the wrong call. They all recognize it, they all took responsibility to some extent in the interviews. Tough day. Now they face the questions.
This is where the DS should simply overrule van Aert though. He is not blameless.
 

Latest posts