• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Teams & Riders Alberto Contador Discussion Thread

Page 1786 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Re:

gunara said:
I come to realization that speculating about Contador's form ahead of big races have been one of the major theme of cycling talks in the last 6 years at least. And the way he somehow delivered results in tough situations, or else unspectacularly failed, always drew such colorful reactions which gave way to even more speculations. Him as an enigma is the only thing that match the rise of Sky empire as pro cycling main story since, I think.
I think that's mostly on here. Other platforms don't seem as enlightened
 
Re: Re:

Red Rick said:
gunara said:
I come to realization that speculating about Contador's form ahead of big races have been one of the major theme of cycling talks in the last 6 years at least. And the way he somehow delivered results in tough situations, or else unspectacularly failed, always drew such colorful reactions which gave way to even more speculations. Him as an enigma is the only thing that match the rise of Sky empire as pro cycling main story since, I think.
I think that's mostly on here. Other platforms don't seem as enlightened

Probably, I must admit I spent almost that last 6 years of my cycling-following life exclusively here :D
 
Re:

LaFlorecita said:
I think Cardoso secured a Tour spot at this race. He was very strong.
Irizar as well.

My assumption has always been that Cardoso was likely but not certain to be in the Tour squad. He's the kind of climbing domestique team leaders like to have around - always turns up for a GT as around the 20th strongest climber but has zero personal ambition.
 
Jul 11, 2009
267
0
0
He's been my favourite rider for a decade and still is, his charisma and style on the bike is without equal, however I think we now just have to enjoy him in the twilight of his career. He may still have a Giro or Vuelta in him depending on the route/competition but the Tour is beyond him. It's a pity that 2008 saw his team not invited to the Tour, I think that year was stratospheric for him, he could have won all 3 Grand Tours in one season putting him above and beyond all riders in the modern era. I can't count Merckx, he was the best in his time but in today's style of racing he wouldn't have won much at all
 
Jul 19, 2009
104
0
0
How many days between altitude camp and the start of Dauphine for Contador? Depending on how that camp was executed it's no wonder why he had to ride conservatively in Dauphine.
 
Aug 6, 2015
4,139
2
0
Re:

Felice Gimondi said:
How many days between altitude camp and the start of Dauphine for Contador? Depending on how that camp was executed it's no wonder why he had to ride conservatively in Dauphine.
1 week
 
Jul 19, 2009
104
0
0
Re: Re:

portugal11 said:
Felice Gimondi said:
How many days between altitude camp and the start of Dauphine for Contador? Depending on how that camp was executed it's no wonder why he had to ride conservatively in Dauphine.
1 week

Can you confirm that? His instagram shows him being on Tenerife as late as 30th. May.
 
Re: Re:

Felice Gimondi said:
portugal11 said:
Felice Gimondi said:
How many days between altitude camp and the start of Dauphine for Contador? Depending on how that camp was executed it's no wonder why he had to ride conservatively in Dauphine.
1 week

Can you confirm that? His instagram shows him being on Tenerife as late as 30th. May.
I think he got back on 31 May, at least that's when De Jongh got back and as you say he was in Tenerife on the 30th. 1st of June shows him in back in Pinto.
I love social media, perfect for stalkers like me :D
 
Jul 6, 2016
599
1
0
Good fun reading six pages back in this thread. We might as well say that Berto himself has a slight advantage over LaFlo in terms of preparation for le Tour. Beware of the troll attacks my dear!
 
I think he needs to provide the goods come July after all the talk of being conservative and using it as a prep race and I don't mean having some sort of kamikaze ride from far out after losing loads of time for whatever reason, just to keep his fans happy! Suppose his sponsors wanted to see him in the race because I don't see what difference it would have made training with his team elsewhere to riding this race, there seemed little effort put in (for his standards) apart from the TT and keeping Porte's wheel for a couple of hundred yards on Chat. Maybe he's keeping his cards close to his chest and sussing out the level of the opposition and what level he needs to attain to be competitive.

I hope what he's said and done pays dividends in the Tour and I would like to see him being competitive for the win/podium but a few of his rivals do seem to be a couple of levels above him at the moment. I know he will have a better team in the Tour which will help him big time, but if he doesn't produce, I hope he tells the truth of why it went wrong and not come up with excuses.

Good luck to him.
 
Jun 15, 2013
121
0
3,680
Re: Re:

LaFlorecita said:
Felice Gimondi said:
portugal11 said:
Felice Gimondi said:
How many days between altitude camp and the start of Dauphine for Contador? Depending on how that camp was executed it's no wonder why he had to ride conservatively in Dauphine.
1 week

Can you confirm that? His instagram shows him being on Tenerife as late as 30th. May.
I think he got back on 31 May, at least that's when De Jongh got back and as you say he was in Tenerife on the 30th. 1st of June shows him in back in Pinto.
I love social media, perfect for stalkers like me :D

Another way to check it is via SDJ's strava...
 
Apr 15, 2016
179
0
0
wheresmybrakes said:
I think he needs to provide the goods come July after all the talk of being conservative and using it as a prep race and I don't mean having some sort of kamikaze ride from far out after losing loads of time for whatever reason, just to keep his fans happy! Suppose his sponsors wanted to see him in the race because I don't see what difference it would have made training with his team elsewhere to riding this race, there seemed little effort put in (for his standards) apart from the TT and keeping Porte's wheel for a couple of hundred yards on Chat. Maybe he's keeping his cards close to his chest and sussing out the level of the opposition and what level he needs to attain to be competitive.

I hope what he's said and done pays dividends in the Tour and I would like to see him being competitive for the win/podium but a few of his rivals do seem to be a couple of levels above him at the moment. I know he will have a better team in the Tour which will help him big time, but if he doesn't produce, I hope he tells the truth of why it went wrong and not come up with excuses.

Good luck to him.

If he has a poor tour it will be due to him being further past his prime than we believed and due to his competitors being better . What other truth do you expect to come out of his mouth other than what we'd know by watching him race ?

Alberto will fight to the end to the best of his abilities , this we know , what we don't know is how far can his abilities take him at this age .
 
Re:

Valv.Piti said:
The part I dislike most about Contador is when he constantly needs to tell the media about this being a training ride. God damn, we know it already. Compare that to Valverde who have kept quiet, rode a very good time trial and then proceeded to have a little fun, attacking a long way from home on 3 stages in a row, you know, to test himself.

Where was the part when Contador needed to test himself? One day to attack and go deep? Might as well just have stayed home if this was all about 'the numbers' as he apparantly can't be bothered about this race, as he has said countless of times, and haven't put in a single attack (?) in the entire race.

I think this has more to do with his performance in this race, and almost any other for that matter, was simply at odds with what we've come to expect: he's AlWAYS racing for the win even when he intimates he's not. He's talked all year long about taking a different approach and even mused that he wasn't sure if he could REALLY do it and not race the Dauphine. I think reporters were asking about it constantly because he wasn't attacking or he was simply letting go when others attacked--in other words he wasn't (at least as far as I can tell) bringing it up on his own. Hence the relatively constant yammering about it versus say Valverde or others.

The race is over and he did precisely what he wanted. That's opened him up to a ton of criticism here and frankly has the betting public all but writing him off. Who knows if it will be worth it, but frankly he's been on the level and consistent about this approach all year. He's frankly damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. So he might as well do what he thinks is best and let the CHIPS fall where they may.
 
red zone said:
wheresmybrakes said:
I think he needs to provide the goods come July after all the talk of being conservative and using it as a prep race and I don't mean having some sort of kamikaze ride from far out after losing loads of time for whatever reason, just to keep his fans happy! Suppose his sponsors wanted to see him in the race because I don't see what difference it would have made training with his team elsewhere to riding this race, there seemed little effort put in (for his standards) apart from the TT and keeping Porte's wheel for a couple of hundred yards on Chat. Maybe he's keeping his cards close to his chest and sussing out the level of the opposition and what level he needs to attain to be competitive.

I hope what he's said and done pays dividends in the Tour and I would like to see him being competitive for the win/podium but a few of his rivals do seem to be a couple of levels above him at the moment. I know he will have a better team in the Tour which will help him big time, but if he doesn't produce, I hope he tells the truth of why it went wrong and not come up with excuses.

Good luck to him.

If he has a poor tour it will be due to him being further past his prime than we believed and due to his competitors being better . What other truth do you expect to come out of his mouth other than what we'd know by watching him race ?

Alberto will fight to the end to the best of his abilities , this we know , what we don't know is how far can his abilities take him at this age .
I agree but I also agree with wheresmybrakes in the sense that I hope if he has a clean run and still comes up short he admits he just can't do it anymore. I really hope he doesn't crash because we need to know if he still has it, not just us fans but also he himself. If he doesn't suffer any mishaps but doesn't win I think he'll be happier than if he crashes again and is again left wondering "what if".
 
Aug 31, 2012
7,550
3
0
Re: Re:

Publicus said:
Valv.Piti said:
The part I dislike most about Contador is when he constantly needs to tell the media about this being a training ride. God damn, we know it already. Compare that to Valverde who have kept quiet, rode a very good time trial and then proceeded to have a little fun, attacking a long way from home on 3 stages in a row, you know, to test himself.

Where was the part when Contador needed to test himself? One day to attack and go deep? Might as well just have stayed home if this was all about 'the numbers' as he apparantly can't be bothered about this race, as he has said countless of times, and haven't put in a single attack (?) in the entire race.

I think this has more to do with his performance in this race, and almost any other for that matter, was simply at odds with what we've come to expect: he's AlWAYS racing for the win even when he intimates he's not. He's talked all year long about taking a different approach and even mused that he wasn't sure if he could REALLY do it and not race the Dauphine. I think reporters were asking about it constantly because he wasn't attacking or he was simply letting go when others attacked--in other words he wasn't (at least as far as I can tell) bringing it up on his own. Hence the relatively constant yammering about it versus say Valverde or others.

The race is over and he did precisely what he wanted. That's opened him up to a ton of criticism here and frankly has the betting public all but writing him off. Who knows if it will be worth it, but frankly he's been on the level and consistent about this approach all year. He's frankly damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. So he might as well do what he thinks is best and let the CHIPS fall where they may.


The betting public didn't really adjust their expectations about him in light of what we learned at the Dauphine. Only one rider became substantially less likely to win the Tour as a result of the Dauphine, and that's Froome.

The markets did not see Contador's performance particularly negative wrt his chances, but his chances were not great to begin with. Which appears to coincide with the consensus in this thread

Because he was strong before the Dauphine, I think the account he gave of his performance is believable. I think he will be substantially stronger at the Tour, stronger than all but Froome and Porte.
 
Cool photo :)
img_cpiedrabuena_20170610-161123_imagenes_md_otras_fuentes_db5cgx3v0aa9bhb-kONC-U4233035701681M-980x554@MundoDeportivo-Web.jpg