How did he? Any half decent GC rider who is not an overall threat could attack on an early climb in the race, bridge to a breakaway and then fade massively and end up nowhere near winning the stage, and losing time on some of the top 10. They just choose not to, because it's a terrible tactic.Red Rick said:Contador added nothing to his palmares today, yet he did add to his legend.
Uhm, after 8 years, one last stage win?Cance > TheRest said:Absolutely. Animated the stage and rode with all he had. What more can you ask as a fan?hrotha said:Screw it, if he hadn't done what he did it would have been a dreadful stage. That's exactly the kind of thing he should be doing if you ask me.![]()
They tank and join the break from the start. Contador put 3 minutes into everyone on the Croix de Fer. Went down fighting his heart out.DFA123 said:How did he? Any half decent GC rider who is not an overall threat could attack on an early climb in the race, bridge to a breakaway and then fade massively and end up nowhere near winning the stage, and losing time on some of the top 10. They just choose not to, because it's a terrible tactic.Red Rick said:Contador added nothing to his palmares today, yet he did add to his legend.
Red Rick said:Contador added nothing to his palmares today, yet he did add to his legend.
Sure, but a lot of riders could also try to stay high in the GC and then do what Contador did today. They just don't because it doesn't work.Red Rick said:They tank and join the break from the start. Contador put 3 minutes into everyone on the Croix de Fer. Went down fighting his heart out.DFA123 said:How did he? Any half decent GC rider who is not an overall threat could attack on an early climb in the race, bridge to a breakaway and then fade massively and end up nowhere near winning the stage, and losing time on some of the top 10. They just choose not to, because it's a terrible tactic.Red Rick said:Contador added nothing to his palmares today, yet he did add to his legend.
DFA123 said:How did he? Any half decent GC rider who is not an overall threat could attack on an early climb in the race, bridge to a breakaway and then fade massively and end up nowhere near winning the stage, and losing time on some of the top 10. They just choose not to, because it's a terrible tactic.Red Rick said:Contador added nothing to his palmares today, yet he did add to his legend.
nah, Barguil will take it surely. And he would deserve it, as would De Gendt.Finn84 said:Contador has a good chance to be on the podium in Paris I think. And that's because he may well win super combativity award.
Don't you think? I had expected him to go a bit better I must admit.Red Rick said:There are many good indications Contador wouldn't be a Tour winner this year. This is hardly one.
Personally, I didn't really feel that it brightened the race up today, because it was also so predictable in how it played out. Sky immediately controlled the gap with ease so nothing was going to happen GC wise and, after the big effort on the CdF, he was never going to outclimb everyone in the break.arvc40 said:DFA123 said:How did he? Any half decent GC rider who is not an overall threat could attack on an early climb in the race, bridge to a breakaway and then fade massively and end up nowhere near winning the stage, and losing time on some of the top 10. They just choose not to, because it's a terrible tactic.Red Rick said:Contador added nothing to his palmares today, yet he did add to his legend.
Mmmm...No the others don't ! Your right. But you know what the GC battle is a **** predictable bore fest and this race needs Contadors ****** tactics to brighten it up. All riders have a part to play.
and as many have pointed out he likely wouldn't have closed the gap to the break and definitely wouldn't have dropped Roglic after that. His only chance to win was going in the break from the start but that was logically not allowed.DFA123 said:Would have been more interesting to see him do a sensible attack on the Telegraphe, with 2/3 teammates up the road to drop back and support, and actually have a chance of staying away.
Gigs_98 said:ThisRed Rick said:The best tactic would have been to lose half an hour yesterday, and then join the breakaway from the get-go today.
My name is Captain Hindsight, and you're welcome.
If there was no getting away on the Telegraphe (and the pace wasnt so high there so he might have been able to imo), then he should have just saved energy for tomorrow. The way it panned out it was such a waste of two strong guys who had made it into the break today - Trek DS really got it wrong.Valv.Piti said:That said, I don't get the people that said this was the wrong tactic. This definitely was the right thing to do in order to win the stage, Contador was just a bit spent in the end, he needed that gap to the peloton and it was worth it. Absolutely no way he rides away from Kwito, Nieve and Landa on Telegraphe and Galibier, just not way.
So just let Mollema or Pantano - who did make it into the break - go for the stage win then and save his effort for tomorrow. Don't do a showy attack that's never going to work.LaFlorecita said:and as many have pointed out he likely wouldn't have closed the gap to the break and definitely wouldn't have dropped Roglic after that. His only chance to win was going in the break from the start but that was logically not allowed.DFA123 said:Would have been more interesting to see him do a sensible attack on the Telegraphe, with 2/3 teammates up the road to drop back and support, and actually have a chance of staying away.
Eh?? "Never going to work" that's a bold statement. Guess you're Captain Hindsight as well!DFA123 said:So just let Mollema or Pantano - who did make it into the break - go for the stage win then and save his effort for tomorrow. Don't do a showy attack that's never going to work.LaFlorecita said:and as many have pointed out he likely wouldn't have closed the gap to the break and definitely wouldn't have dropped Roglic after that. His only chance to win was going in the break from the start but that was logically not allowed.DFA123 said:Would have been more interesting to see him do a sensible attack on the Telegraphe, with 2/3 teammates up the road to drop back and support, and actually have a chance of staying away.
I think that this was incredibly incomparable to other efforts, and usually, and one result doesn't really make the difference between being past it or not. Biggest thing is the huge trend toward short stages and loss of accelerations, as wel as bonking in longer, harder stages. Today he did a huge hour long effort on the CdF, it's hard to recover from that when you still gotta go up the Galibier.Valv.Piti said:Don't you think? I had expected him to go a bit better I must admit.Red Rick said:There are many good indications Contador wouldn't be a Tour winner this year. This is hardly one.
I think you said yourself yesterday that attacking on the CdF was never going to work. I can't fault him for effort and for trying, but I can certainly fault the tactics. He should have lost time yesterday once he was dropped.LaFlorecita said:Eh?? "Never going to work" that's a bold statement. Guess you're Captain Hindsight as well!DFA123 said:So just let Mollema or Pantano - who did make it into the break - go for the stage win then and save his effort for tomorrow. Don't do a showy attack that's never going to work.LaFlorecita said:and as many have pointed out he likely wouldn't have closed the gap to the break and definitely wouldn't have dropped Roglic after that. His only chance to win was going in the break from the start but that was logically not allowed.DFA123 said:Would have been more interesting to see him do a sensible attack on the Telegraphe, with 2/3 teammates up the road to drop back and support, and actually have a chance of staying away.
This was most likely his last real chance to win a Tour stage - you can't fault him for trying.
