- Jul 29, 2012
- 11,703
- 4
- 0
Netserk said:On Tourmalet the victory was already a sure thing. That's the reason why he didn't drop Andy.
He tried to do it
Netserk said:On Tourmalet the victory was already a sure thing. That's the reason why he didn't drop Andy.
No he didn't. See my earlier post regarding jabs and K.O.sMiburo said:He tried to do it![]()
Netserk said:
airstream said:was shamefully stripped due to violations
Fixed it for you.webbie146 said:. Without the chain thing but with Andy still hypocriticaly screwing everyone on the cobbles Andy might have won.
Netserk said:If the chain thing didn't happen, Alberto would have dropped him on Tourmalet.
webbie146 said:Haha you are joking right? Andy was doing all the work on that climb, and followed Contador with no problem when he attack. Andy was clearly stronger then Alberto. Only thing Alberto could do was hang on, no way he could ride away..
Angliru said:...or Contador was riding defensively needing only to follow Andy and after responding to his attacks decided to put one in of his own. I think it's difficult to say that either was stronger considering the circumstances. I don't recall seeing Contador in any difficulty in answering Andy's attacks and as you said Andy was able to cover Contador's lone attack. If one was clearly stronger there would've been an eventual gap that the other could not bridge. That did not happen.
Netserk said:Contador's attack wasn't to drop Andy. Only to send the message that he should stop attacking, so they could ride to the top together.
Incorrect. Andy ended up losing just as much time on the final ITT as he did during chaingate.webbie146 said:That, and Andy was stronger in 2010. Without the chain thing Andy would had won anyways.
Netserk said:Contador's attack wasn't to drop Andy. Only to send the message that he should stop attacking, so they could ride to the top together.
rzombie1988 said:Incorrect. Andy ended up losing just as much time on the final ITT as he did during chaingate.
Taxus4a said:Andy was very strong those days, he did a powerful ITT with headwind in Bourdeux.
Contador was behind Andy and try to leave him once in Tourmalet, but he didnt.
webbie146 said:That, and Andy was stronger in 2010. Without the chain thing Andy would had won anyways.
Miburo said:Andy did an average ITT. It just that Contador's ITT was trash.
Ruudz0r said:And what about the 2 flat tires from Contador in the Roubaix stage?
Angliru said:I don't think they were flats. His rear wheel was damaged when Frank Schleck crashed out resulting in Contador having to ride with a warped rear wheel with the tire rubbing against the frame.
Cimber said:Point still stads though. Andy lost time due to a mechanical, so did Bertie.
airstream said:Who cares how they looked compared to their best perfomances? 100000%, when Contador or anyone else won some of his TT's, some favorites did 'trash' too and what?
They rode as they could. That's all that matters.
This. Andy didn't have any bad luck during that Tour. It was the opposite.Carols said:Guess it depends how you define mechanicalI don't consider mis-shifting to be a mechanical; instead it is rider error.
