Netserk said:
Lol @ where you have placed Nibali. Just a tiny bit better than Valverde, and clearly worse than both Purito and Porte. Ridiculous.
Why is it ridiculous?
With Porte and Purito we saw them set great times in the TDF against great competition, Porte while taking it easy.
With Nibali he won a Giro that was totally ruined by the weather so what can we read into that. People have been hyping his performance there as if it was on par with Froome on something but how the **** can anyone reach conclusions from that. First 3 mountains he was marginally better than the others. Of course he seemed to be holding back on 2 of them but since he didnt go full out we can't tell how strong he may have been.
Then on the tt that was powerful, but what was the competition.
If you take the entire top 10 and compile me the best results of any of them in the mountains outside of this Giro over the last 2 years. Evans has a 3rd in PDBF. Uran 1 or 2 good top 5s in the 2012 Giro. Santa a few good ones from this year and he matched Nibali before things happened . Thats about it.
Then theres Tre Cime. He beat them but again, were any that strong? Duarte was even in the mix. He beat Di Luca's time by a few secs but the variables (worse conditions but much easier stage and rest day before) were so different its hard to read too much into that comparison.
From that or Trentino even how on earth are we meant to tell he was Porte level?
Maybe he was but if its a maybe i dont get why you are dismissing the idea that he wasn't as ridiculous.
I dont think the evidence exists either way so I look back to Nibali and I think Nibali 2010,11, and 12 versions would all have won the 2013 Giro, maybe 09 version too so i dont think its that ridiculous to assume he's a similar rider, with some improvements to his previous version and that guy never showed the kind of climbing Porte and Purito did last year. You and other Nibali fans assume he stepped up and went to their level. That's fine but until this years tour, its just an assumption.