• The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Teams & Riders Alberto Contador Discussion Thread

Page 2015 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Wasn't the beginning ridden not as hard? I don't remember fully and haven't had time to rewatch Lantern Rouges video.
Nah the beginning was done super fast. Apart from a shallow cat 2 it was basically a unipuerto stage with some false flat kms, but the fact that it only had 10 dudes remaining after 3km of climbing shows you the speed on the bottom must have been insane.

Still, even considering that, it's by far the biggest VAM and W/kg outlier in the last 15 years, it might even be Schlecks best performance, so I don't really doubt there was also a significant tailwind too.

Also it's a pattern we've come to see quite often now where a unipuerto stage that's just completely drilled on the bottom of the climb gets insane gaps compared to big multimountain stages for some reason.

Still sad Contador didn't go loco on Mont Ventoux that year.
 
That performance on verbier wasn t that so good! That stage just had one mountain climb, and verbier is not that so hard.
Bradley wiggins just lost 1 min and 9 seconds to contador on that climb, and wiggins weren t a great climber. Quintana, froome or schleck had done better performances than that in their careers.
Remember ax 3 domaines 2013, froome climbed ax 3 domaines in 21 min and 40 seconds, contador climbed verbier in 20 min and 55 s. Froome just lost 45 seconds, with port pailheres before ax 3 domaines and, not forget ax 3 domaines is a little bit dificult.
Quintana this year had done a better performance than contador on verbier, on mont ventoux.
 
Nah the beginning was done super fast. Apart from a shallow cat 2 it was basically a unipuerto stage with some false flat kms, but the fact that it only had 10 dudes remaining after 3km of climbing shows you the speed on the bottom must have been insane.

Still, even considering that, it's by far the biggest VAM and W/kg outlier in the last 15 years, it might even be Schlecks best performance, so I don't really doubt there was also a significant tailwind too.

Also it's a pattern we've come to see quite often now where a unipuerto stage that's just completely drilled on the bottom of the climb gets insane gaps compared to big multimountain stages for some reason.

Still sad Contador didn't go loco on Mont Ventoux that year.
But then he couldn't give the thumbs up to Lance :D
 
That performance on verbier wasn t that so good! That stage just had one mountain climb, and verbier is not that so hard.
Bradley wiggins just lost 1 min and 9 seconds to contador on that climb, and wiggins weren t a great climber. Quintana, froome or schleck had done better performances than that in their careers.
Remember ax 3 domaines 2013, froome climbed ax 3 domaines in 21 min and 40 seconds, contador climbed verbier in 20 min and 55 s. Froome just lost 45 seconds, with port pailheres before ax 3 domaines and, not forget ax 3 domaines is a little bit dificult.
Quintana this year had done a better performance than contador on verbier, on mont ventoux.

Not very surprising, coming from 'Andy Schleck' :p

Good point about the Pailheres though.
 
People need to stop to that history of the 6.77 w/kg, it was a great performance, but not the best ever, and nothing that other gc riders can t do.
Quintana had done this year 6.75 watts/kg on ventoux, in a effort of 27 min! Not 20 min. In 20 min que can do for shure 6.9 w/kg.
Froome had done 6.45 w/kg on ax 3 domaines with pailhered in his legs. And if froome does 6.45 w/kg and contador does 6.77, froome is more fast in a climb because froome has more weight. Contador-62 kg×6.77 w/kg=420, froome weight 6.45×67kg=422 watts, more 12 watts.
 

TRENDING THREADS