Publicus said:Google translation is terrible, but if I read it correctly, this is just more proof that this kid has his head screwed on straight and his eyes wide open.
Totally, this is going to be one of the best tours for years.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Publicus said:Google translation is terrible, but if I read it correctly, this is just more proof that this kid has his head screwed on straight and his eyes wide open.
Hotbrakes said:I wish Contador had switched to another team, that would make this Tour alot more interesting. But would he be as good with out the help of JB? I think at the moment he is the best on the bike, but not as good with the off bike politics. His desicion to help Valverde win the Dauphine was his best move yet. It might come in handy when at the end of the Tour he has no friends on Astana.
ad9898 said:Contador is a classy rider for sure, but I predict Armstrong putting 30 secs into him on that flat ITT, leaving us a showdown on Ventoux, where Contador will likely beat Armstrong, but not by the 30 secs required. This is going to be the best 'last week' in a Tour for a very long time.
Publicus said:Could happen. Or he doesn't. I think the smartest thing I've heard is from Baby Schleck: the other GC contenders can't wait until Ventoux. Schleck and Sastre, in particular, just aren't good at the ITT and can't afford to give up more time. There will be some serious attacking on Stage 13, 15, and 17. All trying to get back minutes, not seconds. How Armstrong (or Contador) responds to that (should it occur) is anyone's guess and I don't think we learned anything about his climbing legs other than they more resemble Levi's than Contador's (or Lance 2001).
BroDeal said:Is Contador stupid? This Velonews article says that he wil not chase down Armstrong if Armstrong attacks and will leave the chase to other riders.
http://tour-de-france.velonews.com/article/95074/contador-says-he-won-t-follow-armstrong-if-attacks
Who does not think Armstrong will take this as an invitation to attack Contador on the Verbier stage?
BroDeal said:Is Contador stupid? This Velonews article says that he wil not chase down Armstrong if Armstrong attacks and will leave the chase to other riders.
http://tour-de-france.velonews.com/article/95074/contador-says-he-won-t-follow-armstrong-if-attacks
Who does not think Armstrong will take this as an invitation to attack Contador on the Verbier stage?
Chomsky said:The only reason Contador said that is because he knows Lance and Levi will not attack. Contador is the only one of the 4 contenders left capable of attacking a big group and going away. He said it to make the point that if he attacks none of the other 3 contenders are allowed to follow because they are all on his team. His hope is to attack and put time on Levi, Lance and Kloeden and essentially end the GC race when he knows they are defenseless and are not allowed to attack back. Like he did in stage 7. Great way to win a tour Alberto.
His statement just illustrates how insecure Contador is and how he does not care if he wins without honour. He is scared about Levi and to a lesser degree Lance in the ITT and he wants to put time on them both when they cannot fight back.
I am constantly amazed how blinded people are here because of their hate towards Lance. This hate will allow them to condone anything Contador does.
Chomsky said:The only reason Contador said that is because he knows Lance and Levi will not attack. Contador is the only one of the 4 contenders left capable of attacking a big group and going away. He said it to make the point that if he attacks none of the other 3 contenders are allowed to follow because they are all on his team. His hope is to attack and put time on Levi, Lance and Kloeden and essentially end the GC race when he knows they are defenseless and are not allowed to attack back. Like he did in stage 7. Great way to win a tour Alberto.
His statement just illustrates how insecure Contador is and how he does not care if he wins without honour. He is scared about Levi and to a lesser degree Lance in the ITT and he wants to put time on them both when they cannot fight back.
I am constantly amazed how blinded people are here because of their hate towards Lance. This hate will allow them to condone anything Contador does.
Chomsky said:His statement just illustrates how insecure Contador is and how he does not care if he wins without honour. He is scared about Levi and to a lesser degree Lance in the ITT and he wants to put time on them both when they cannot fight back.
Publicus said:The fact is he probably can't put in a big enough acceleration to dislodge Sastre, Evans or Schleck.
BroDeal said:Is Contador stupid? This Velonews article says that he wil not chase down Armstrong if Armstrong attacks and will leave the chase to other riders.
Smera1 said:Care to elaborate why if he win it would be without honor ? And don't you think that the attack on Arcalis showed that he is not scared about his opponents at all ?
Chomsky said:It is without honor because he knows he can put time into the only 3 rivals left and they cannot attack back just like he did on Arcalis. he knows he is the only one of the 4 contenders left that can attack a big group and stay away from the group. If he wants to win the tour with honor he should attack in a small group when Levi and Lance can attack back or on let all Astana riders attack each other and be able to respond to attacks on Ventoux. I agree with everyone that Contador is the strongest rider I just would like to see a fair race where all 4 can fight and fight back against each other. Putting cheap time on your rivals when they have their hands tied behind their backs is like attacking after an accident or mechanical. It does not allow us to say the strongest rider won.
Chomsky said:His statement just illustrates how insecure Contador is and how he does not care if he wins without honour.
Chomsky said:It is without honor because he knows he can put time into the only 3 rivals left and they cannot attack back just like he did on Arcalis. he knows he is the only one of the 4 contenders left that can attack a big group and stay away from the group. If he wants to win the tour with honor he should attack in a small group when Levi and Lance can attack back or on let all Astana riders attack each other and be able to respond to attacks on Ventoux. I agree with everyone that Contador is the strongest rider I just would like to see a fair race where all 4 can fight and fight back against each other. Putting cheap time on your rivals when they have their hands tied behind their backs is like attacking after an accident or mechanical. It does not allow us to say the strongest rider won.
Chomsky said:The only reason Contador said that is because he knows Lance and Levi will not attack. Contador is the only one of the 4 contenders left capable of attacking a big group and going away. He said it to make the point that if he attacks none of the other 3 contenders are allowed to follow because they are all on his team. His hope is to attack and put time on Levi, Lance and Kloeden and essentially end the GC race when he knows they are defenseless and are not allowed to attack back. Like he did in stage 7. Great way to win a tour Alberto.
His statement just illustrates how insecure Contador is and how he does not care if he wins without honour. He is scared about Levi and to a lesser degree Lance in the ITT and he wants to put time on them both when they cannot fight back.
I am constantly amazed how blinded people are here because of their hate towards Lance. This hate will allow them to condone anything Contador does. Funny thing is if Lance was not in the race these same people who now love everything AC does would of course be hating everything about AC because of his connection to Lance through JB.
Chomsky said:It is without honor because he knows he can put time into the only 3 rivals left and they cannot attack back just like he did on Arcalis. he knows he is the only one of the 4 contenders left that can attack a big group and stay away from the group. If he wants to win the tour with honor he should attack in a small group when Levi and Lance can attack back or on let all Astana riders attack each other and be able to respond to attacks on Ventoux. I agree with everyone that Contador is the strongest rider I just would like to see a fair race where all 4 can fight and fight back against each other. Putting cheap time on your rivals when they have their hands tied behind their backs is like attacking after an accident or mechanical. It does not allow us to say the strongest rider won.
Chomsky said:It is without honor because he knows he can put time into the only 3 rivals left and they cannot attack back just like he did on Arcalis.
BroDeal said:I am not convinced of this. We don't have much data to go on other than Armstrong does not quite look the same as he used to when climbing. I also am not convinced that Andy Schleck is as strong as he was last year. The moderate grade of the Verbier stage is less suited to a climber like Andy.
Contador should make sure he attacks first.
Chomsky said:I am constantly amazed how blinded people are here because of their hate towards Lance. This hate will allow them to condone anything Contador does. Funny thing is if Lance was not in the race these same people who now love everything AC does would of course be hating everything about AC because of his connection to Lance through JB.