At: Chomsky
Have you forgotten who is wearing and was given the team's #1 bib? As team leader it is his option to attack when he chooses. YOU are so blinded by your secret Armstrong bromance that you can't see that his attack was a stroke of tactical genius. Evans had just attacked, was brought back and was recovering. Van Den Broeck was off the front, likely trying to setup Evans a bit too soon. Contador jumped on it leaving everyone else, with the exception of Andy Schleck, flatfooted. HE WAS ATTACKING HIS OPPONENTS. All this "defenseless" bs you keep spouting is completely ridiculous. Every person who follows cycling and this event in the world knew that Contador would attack on Arcalis. He admittedly reconned the climb at least 3 times. As he has stated in interviews the only plan was to answer attacks on the climb. They expected more attacks from Sastre, the Schlecks, Evans and others but only Evans of the contenders actually made an attempt.
The opportunity to take time out of your opponents presents itself and an attacking by nature climber like Contador is supposed to pass it up? I'm sure he took the lack of attacks as a sign of weakness in his opponents and jumped on it. He did what needed to be done and gained time on his opponents because of it. He also exposed Andy Schleck as being unable to match his climbing speed or acceleration regardless of what
list of excuses A. Schleck gave for getting dropped.
The only thing that is defenseless is your argument.