masking_agent said:i just don't like the look of the c59, compared to what I have chosen.
LugHugger said:Actually, the c40 is named after the year of Colnago's anniversary. The C40 was still in production as recently as 2004.
A good source of well-researched Colnago info may be found here
forty four said:wow you guys are behind actually specialized makes some of the best frames period based on independent testing regarding weight/stiffness cervelos and scotts are great to. treks are quite heavy compared and colnago pinerello etc heavy and outdated it amuses me that people still pay for names when buying frames.![]()
darkcloud said:There is capacity and know-how in the developed world. Raw materials are easily shipped to any destination on the planet. Cost prohibitive to move production to the US or Europe? I doubt it. I could be wrong.
Bottom line is that the decision to manufacture in that part of the world was made in order to make maximum profit for the corporation by paying workers pennies on the dollar. Big corporations feel they owe no allegiance to anyone other than shareholders. That is why so much production of quality goods has left the US and been replaced by imported JUNK. IMO.
darkcloud said:Nowhereman,
Not emotional at all. Re-reading my post I can see that I DID get off topic a bit, though.
I was speaking in terms of junk products that we purchase in everyday life simply because they are no longer manufactured in the USA. As I said, I went off topic.
I understand that most cf frames are manufactured overseas. I don't lose sleep over it and realize that there are some very high quality products coming from there. My Orbea frame that was made made in China and finished in Spain would be but one example. I believed that the "made in Spain" sticker meant just that. Hmm. I learn something new every day.
At some point, though, a conscious decision was made to not manufacture those products here or in Europe.$$$$$
Fact of the matter is: There is the know how to manufacture these products in the US or Europe. Think Boeing or Airbus, for example.
Raw materials can indeed be shipped. Happens all the time. Day in/day out.
Cost prohibitive to move manufacturing? Probably so. Especially when profit margins are taken into account. The corporate bottom line tends to look better when labor is cheap cheap cheap.
DC