• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Amstel Gold Race 2025, one day classic, April 20 (men's)

Page 32 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Remco should have launched his sprint on the Cauberg. A very amusing cameo by Alaphilippe. I suppose the race was great because the Pog was there for the taking. Perfect that Skjelmose won too.
(Unfortunately, I expect the Pog to reload and be in unbeatable form in Liege, but maybe, just maybe ... so I'll watch LBL anyway - it's kind of my monument).
Listening to Pogi's and Remco's interviews they both kinda waited for an attack. If it had happened it might have been the attacker that would have been third place. They were all tired but not so much a closely watched attack would just turn into a leadout. They all rode the smart finale and Skjelmose was quicker. Great result for him!

That overall course is great and I think most serious cyclists would love to ride it hard in a controlled environment....the roads are amazing.
 
Yeah, but I think in this case he was right about starting his sprint too late. The whole run in I was shouting in my head..."Remco, do NOT lead them out!"
And here I am thinking he started his sprint too early. When you're on the front all you have to do is lose less than one bike length, and the shorter the sprint the easier that is to do. Remco started a few seconds before he had to and also took an angle that lengthened the distance to the line. Ideally you would not get out of the saddle until the moment the riders behind are attempting to come around.
 
Jul 27, 2024
50
52
280
UAE needs a team coach to plan and help execute race strateggies while the race is in progress. McNulty should have been told to join Skjelmose and Evenepoel when they chased Pogacar. Normally, DS gives eating advise, forgetting that his other riders could contribute too. I doubt if DS was monitoring the speed of the chasers in relation to the speed of their breakaway rider. If closely monitored, lead rider would be asdvised to cruise to maintain distance or incrase wattage to extend the gap.
 
Remco should have launched his sprint on the Cauberg. A very amusing cameo by Alaphilippe. I suppose the race was great because the Pog was there for the taking. Perfect that Skjelmose won too.
(Unfortunately, I expect the Pog to reload and be in unbeatable form in Liege, but maybe, just maybe ... so I'll watch LBL anyway - it's kind of my monument).

Alaphilippe: "I did that all for topcat. He's always supported me. He's my topdawg."

Spoken suavely slurred of course.
 
UAE needs a team coach to plan and help execute race strateggies while the race is in progress. McNulty should have been told to join Skjelmose and Evenepoel when they chased Pogacar. Normally, DS gives eating advise, forgetting that his other riders could contribute too. I doubt if DS was monitoring the speed of the chasers in relation to the speed of their breakaway rider. If closely monitored, lead rider would be asdvised to cruise to maintain distance or incrase wattage to extend the gap.
McNulty didn't have enough in the tank to do that. No one stayed with Remco once he made that last attack, and then he linked up with Skelmose who was already out in front.
 
  • Like
Reactions: proffate
UAE needs a team coach to plan and help execute race strateggies while the race is in progress. McNulty should have been told to join Skjelmose and Evenepoel when they chased Pogacar. Normally, DS gives eating advise, forgetting that his other riders could contribute too. I doubt if DS was monitoring the speed of the chasers in relation to the speed of their breakaway rider. If closely monitored, lead rider would be asdvised to cruise to maintain distance or incrase wattage to extend the gap.
Exactly. I keep yelling at my screen all the time as well "JUST FOLLOW POGACAR" or "CLIMB FASTER, YOU LOUSY HACK!". I mean, it's so obvious what they should do, even a child could think of it. And i still can't figure out why they just don't do it. It's not rocket science, just ride faster than the other guys and win the race.

Or maybe UAE should count their blessings that McNulty was even there at that point to begin with and he was able to shut down Evenepoel's first attack at all.
 
Last edited:
Bemelerberg delivers again! Fantastic that they kept the additional kms afterwards before the descent to Cauberg.

@Libertine Seguros
Bemelerberg delivered nothing.

The additional kilometre detour did have its use in the men's race at least.

So, how about that final ascent of Cauberg coming back? I'd say the race delivered a bit of a bloody nose to both of our theories.
 
  • Like
Reactions: E_F_
Bemelerberg delivered nothing.

The additional kilometre detour did have its use in the men's race at least.

So, how about that final ascent of Cauberg coming back? I'd say the race delivered a bit of a bloody nose to both of our theories.

Wasn't the main theory that today's style of long distance-racing would not be influenced by Cauberg's reintroduction in the final? Which was proven true.
 
Wasn't the main theory that today's style of long distance-racing would not be influenced by Cauberg's reintroduction in the final? Which was proven true.
Netserk was pushing that adding a further climb of Cauberg would be a negative relative to recent years because the race had been better for having Bemelerberg as the finale, I was pushing that Bemelerberg is a nothingburger and extending the run-in before final Cauberg would be a negative impact because if Cauberg was the final climb, extending the gap between penultimate and final Cauberg would neuter racing earlier than Cauberg.

Turns out Netserk was right that the impact of reintroducing Cauberg wouldn't be as great as I feared, but claiming that Bemelerberg delivered is also very much wrong because it, as anticipated, delivered nothing. However, the detour on the final lap between it and the final Cauberg that I was so critical of was, in fact, crucial to the denouement of the race.

The other thing was the thinking that their reasoning behind reintroducing the Cauberg finale was that they were trying to push the race as being more of a hilly Classic - but while Pogačar built his lead on the sequence of the good climbs in the race, it was the flat part where he was brought back. I also bear a grudge against that crappy 2012 circuit because of its detrimental effect on the women's race for several years and the fact that the involvement of the actual good climbs AGR has to offer are usually a token ride through 100km from the finish for the ladies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: E_F_
Netserk was pushing that adding a further climb of Cauberg would be a negative relative to recent years because the race had been better for having Bemelerberg as the finale, I was pushing that Bemelerberg is a nothingburger and extending the run-in before final Cauberg would be a negative impact because if Cauberg was the final climb, extending the gap between penultimate and final Cauberg would neuter racing earlier than Cauberg.

Turns out Netserk was right that the impact of reintroducing Cauberg wouldn't be as great as I feared, but claiming that Bemelerberg delivered is also very much wrong because it, as anticipated, delivered nothing. However, the detour on the final lap between it and the final Cauberg that I was so critical of was, in fact, crucial to the denouement of the race.

But why would you want the hardest climbs at the end? It's perfect that the Eyserbosweg and the Keutenberg are placed quite far from the finish to initiate relatively early action instead of just being immediately before the finish. And it's certainly fine to have small lumps like Geulhemmerweg and Bemelerberg in the run-in instead of it being completely flat like the long drags home we have in some of the cobbled classics like Kuurne, E3 and Gent-Wevelgem where the racing really gets quite stale.
 
But why would you want the hardest climbs at the end? It's perfect that the Eyserbosweg and the Keutenberg are placed quite far from the finish to initiate relatively early action instead of just being immediately before the finish. And it's certainly fine to have small lumps like Geulhemmerweg and Bemelerberg in the run-in instead of it being completely flat like the long drags home we have in some of the cobbled classics like Kuurne, E3 and Gent-Wevelgem where the racing really gets quite stale.
I just felt the organisers wanted to be more of a 'hilly Classic', which was behind their desire to bring back the Cauberg finale, but if that's what they want then using the extended circuit that put those nothingburger climbs near the finish but having the Cauberg finale is actually worse than either the 2003-12 routes (which had the Cauberg finale, but the other climbs closer to the finish) or the 2017-24 routes (which didn't have the hilltop finish, meaning that those nothingburger climbs were the last climbs, incentivising earlier action but perhaps getting away from the identity the organisers were trying to push). For me, 2013 to 2016 were some of my least fondly-remembered editions and the 2012 Worlds circuit (and its extension with Geulhemmerweg) has been terrible for the women's race, so restoring that route had a very negative connotation to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: E_F_