I just felt the organisers wanted to be more of a 'hilly Classic', which was behind their desire to bring back the Cauberg finale, but if that's what they want then using the extended circuit that put those nothingburger climbs near the finish but having the Cauberg finale is actually worse than either the 2003-12 routes (which had the Cauberg finale, but the other climbs closer to the finish) or the 2017-24 routes (which didn't have the hilltop finish, meaning that those nothingburger climbs were the last climbs, incentivising earlier action but perhaps getting away from the identity the organisers were trying to push). For me, 2013 to 2016 were some of my least fondly-remembered editions and the 2012 Worlds circuit (and its extension with Geulhemmerweg) has been terrible for the women's race, so restoring that route had a very negative connotation to me.
As Netserk said, what has happened with the women's race is completely irrelevant to this discussion and besides, I don't have any clue about that. Your hatred of a piece of road seems a bit silly to me, I must say. Especially because all evidence points towards the fact that it does no bad for the race to be close to the finish in this day and age, yet you seem to still be living in a world where riders like Gerrans and Valverde are the prime protagonists of the Ardennes Classics.