JPM London said:
I follow you there completely, but on the other hand athletes - not just cycling ones - are medically/physiologically monitored on a whole different level than compared to us regular folks. Also apart from any sinister "preparation" they might or might not do. I'd guess they'd do a "complete medical" for a lot the rest of us would just wait for to get out of the system on its own...
Agreed, and I'd certainly allow for the remote possibility that these comments are on the level. However...
...if I were having knee problems bad enough to sideline me completely for 3 days, my training would have been impacted by this issue for a long time before actually seeking treatment. If he'd have said, "I've been having knee issues all spring, and in (insert week/month or whatever) I sought treatment and they solved it with X". Not...
...I'm behind because I holed up in a clinic for 3 days last month for (undisclosed, undescribed) knee problems.
Maybe I'm not seeing the whole interview (where are the follow up questions?) or maybe I'm reading a translation/excerpt that is not explaining the whole issue.
But the reality is that Andy Schleck throws so many "doper" flags for me that anything like this he says which is in any way suspicious that he fuels the fire.
So to answer the original question, there are plenty of riders who I'd be more inclined to believe if they had a more credible story than the particular nonsense AS delivered. But when AS says what he said, the way he said it, when he said it that I think it's laughable.