• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Andy Schleck's chain jammed

Page 2 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

Andy schleck's chain jammed

  • contador should have waited andy

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
May 13, 2009
692
1
0
Mind you, I was a big fan of the Schleck boys a couple of seasons ago and would love to see a tight race. As much as I like Alberto the sport and fans could benefit from Schleck beating Alberto at least once just to make the race more interesting over the next few seasons.

However, I am getting sick and tired of his spoiled-brat attitude. Biggest hypocrisy being how he never talks about how Cancellara literally stopped the race in order to wait for him.

Schleck's comment is priceless: "It's hard to say which is more difficult. The Galibier is higher, isn't it? (the Col du Tourmalet is 2115m, the Col du Galibier is 2642m). Altitude is an important factor. I prefer the Alps but simply because I find them more beautiful!" than pretty much defines him as an athlete..
 
Archibald said:
it's July already?

july.jpg


epic paint is epic :p
 
Mar 13, 2009
181
0
0
The silly thing with this debate and most certainly one the A.Schleck won't (or doesn't) see is he opened the attack. From that point it's race on.

He attacked, screwed it up, then expects others to wait for hm :rolleyes:

Nope, every rider had the right to keep on going (it wasn't just Contador).
 
Oct 29, 2009
1,095
0
0
indurain666 said:
However, I am getting sick and tired of his spoiled-brat attitude. Biggest hypocrisy being how he never talks about how Cancellara literally stopped the race in order to wait for him.

He didn't neutralise just for Andy. Doubtless, Shleck did benefit, but I remember AC crashed also and was shepherded back to the peloton.

"It was like skating on ice, and the bike was uncontrollable." -Contador

"That wasn't a strike. With this action we wanted to show our solidarity with the many crash victims." -Linus Gerdeman

"We knew that crashes were unavoidable so we tried to set the pace at the front of the pack but the surface was simply as slippery as soap and bikes and motor bikes were scattered everywhere in the chaos on the descent." Bjarne Riis
 
SiAp1984 said:
As a sportsman, he should have waited. Like Armstrong waited for Ullrich 2001 and - even more comparable to chaingate - Ullrich waited for Armstrong in 2003, as Ullrich was second to Armstrong in this very moment.

No, you clown. At that moment, Ullrich attacked, but with his punchy style he did not gained much and didn´t succeed with the escape.

As a professional cyclist, he knew that he would lose the Tour to Schleck if he didn't attack: Schleck had easily dropped AC just a few seconds before the incident and AC was in serious trouble.

:D

I can understand that AC decided to attack. But this attack showed what - among other things which would belong in a different forum - seperates AC from the true champions of the sport: He is just a (very) talented rider, not a champion.

Which else "great champion from the past" has waited when a serious rival has faced trouble in the past? Since you obviously know jack-**** about cycling i wont except an answer.

Teach your god how to shift gear and then we can discuss.
 
Sep 7, 2010
770
0
0
If Andy had to ability to change gears on his bike this would never have been up for discussion. instead he makes a fool of himself by moaning about Contador and imbarrassed his mechanics though they had done nothing wrong. Andy seemed like a nice chap a couple of years ago but has turned into a little baby. Hope Frank beats Andy this year. Frank is alright.
 
Jul 28, 2010
2,274
0
0
Angliru said:
Andy is the only one of the participants that is keeping it alive.

The best way to kill this topic is to ignore Andy. I like him, but it's for the best.

(And close this thread.)
 
SiAp1984 said:
As a sportsman, he should have waited. Like Armstrong waited for Ullrich 2001 and - even more comparable to chaingate - Ullrich waited for Armstrong in 2003, as Ullrich was second to Armstrong in this very moment.

As a professional cyclist, he knew that he would lose the Tour to Schleck if he didn't attack: Schleck had easily dropped AC just a few seconds before the incident and AC was in serious trouble.

I can understand that AC decided to attack. But this attack showed what - among other things which would belong in a different forum - seperates AC from the true champions of the sport: He is just a (very) talented rider, not a champion.

Is Armstrong the only reference point that many of you have? There are other circumstances involving other riders that one could choose from. Armstrong's incident doesn't automatically validate Wandy Schwecks whiny persepctive. His team has since shown that sportsmanship is not high on their list of priorities. Now whining, that has to be near the top, along with questionable tactical decisions.:D
 
Angliru said:
Andy is the only one of the participants that is keeping it alive.

Andy is the only one that lost the TDF because of it. (Or was he questioned about it?) In any case this is just Andy creating a s-storm and saying he was better than Bertie last year. Andy is back in smack-talking form, and a thread should be set aside just to handle it all. I also enjoyed his preference for the Alps over the Pyrenees, lol. (I voted Contador was right)
 
Oct 29, 2009
1,095
0
0
Angliru said:
What it was was a natural reaction to one's primary opponent mounting an attack. The fact that you fail to see this is quite puzzling.

True, but AC continued knowing that Andy had a mechanical. That was the move of desperate man. Personally, I see it as cowardly, like kicking a downed a opponent.

If the roles were reversed, I'd feel the same sense of disgust toward Schleck.
 
Trev_S said:
The silly thing with this debate and most certainly one the A.Schleck won't (or doesn't) see is he opened the attack. From that point it's race on.

He attacked, screwed it up, then expects others to wait for hm :rolleyes:

Nope, every rider had the right to keep on going (it wasn't just Contador).

Exactly. If you start a fight don't expect your opponent to wait until you get your self together.

Andy must have mistaken the Tour for a "No Drop" ride, where mechanicals are a reason to stop and wait.;)
 
SiAp1984 said:
As a professional cyclist, he knew that he would lose the Tour to Schleck if he didn't attack: Schleck had easily dropped AC just a few seconds before the incident and AC was in serious trouble.

lol. Did you watch the stage last year or did you just read about it?

I encourage you to take another look at the footage. When AS's chain came off it took AC only 3 seconds to pass AS. He was not even close to being in trouble. The only reason why he wasn't in AS's wheels immediately was because he was badly positioned.
 
ImmaculateKadence said:
True, but AC continued knowing that Andy had a mechanical. That was the move of desperate man. Personally, I see it as cowardly, like kicking a downed a opponent.

If the roles were reversed, I'd feel the same sense of disgust toward Schleck.

For some strange reason I find that hard to believe.
 
ImmaculateKadence said:
True, but AC continued knowing that Andy had a mechanical. That was the move of desperate man. Personally, I see it as cowardly, like kicking a downed a opponent.

If the roles were reversed, I'd feel the same sense of disgust toward Schleck.

For all Contador knew Andy could've been inflicted with a serious cramp in his hammies. Contador passed Andy on the left/cliff side of the road with little room to spare. Vino was on the inside. Andy was still rolling although not pedaling any longer. You're on a mountain road, passing your opponent on the cliff side with likely a precarious drop on your left, and you're supposed to take the time to peruse the state of your opponent's bike?
 
May 26, 2009
3,687
2
0
ImmaculateKadence said:
True, but AC continued knowing that Andy had a mechanical. That was the move of desperate man. Personally, I see it as cowardly, like kicking a downed a opponent.

If the roles were reversed, I'd feel the same sense of disgust toward Schleck.
Steering, shifting, it's part of the game.

Andy lost because he made a serious error by going away with a ridiculous gear (big in front and big in the back). Then he tried to shift his front in full flight (as obviously his legs went BOOM)...

Sorry, if you do silly, unnecessary stuff that, you simply have it coming. he could have chosen a gear with the same transmission but with a more sensible chain line.

You are being disgusted with the wrong guy. You should be disgusted with AS because he showed that he perfectly ruined the best chance he ever had to beat AS.

So... if AS screws up, AC has to wait as that is honorable. Yet attacking when AC is going to the back to talk to his DS is ok?

I find both perfectly ok... yet you think one is more honorable than the other.
 
Kazistuta said:
2010 called...they want their TDF discussion back.
+1.


dabaideschbi said:
i am tired of listening andy schleck complaining about what happened last year! I think AC had the right to attack him when andy's chain jammed! so after almost a year what do you think of that episode???
do you think that AC should have waited Andy or he was right to attack him?



e07ea09e-f42f-41ad-be28-fe407b74033b.jpg
 
I want Andy Schleck to do well, but he needs to shut up about this crap. Even with all the information after the fact, the incident is at best arguable. In the heat of the race and with other contenders riding onward too, it's a hell of a lot to ask that Contador wait... oh, and get all the others near him to wait too. I get that Andy was frustrated that day. He vented. Fine. Now it's almost a year later. Shut the f**k up, Andy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.