"another interesting piece I found on the UCI and president Pat McQuaid " Thread

Page 17 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
The rumour is the UCI's WorldTour format apparently to be overhauled for 2015.

I suspect we'll some substantial changes including events resembling the breakaway league concept of short stage races among other efforts to better monetize cycling.

The Big losers will be everyone involved in highly ranked UCI events just below the highest race category.
 
Race Radio said:

So THAT'S how they do it. If you want the elites, then not only do you jump through the UCI's administrative hoops, you pay "a private company" for some additional privileges, ohh like getting your event approved by the UCI.

Hein is growing cycling all right!!! It makes complete sense why they want races in far-off locales where no one watches. It's worth millions.
 
Jan 30, 2011
802
0
0
Benotti69 said:
You knows things are FUBAR'd when the Russkis are *****ing about making the requisite back handers

Yes, though I can see the Russians being ****ed off about paying a foreign company for the rights to the tour of their own country.

Business practices inside Russia are one thing, but being outplayed by a foreign entity wouldn't sit well. The Russians are very proud and most of the population would take the view that in order to hold the Tour of Russia, it is Russia that should be paid by the UCI, not the other way around.

More evidence of UCI corrupt practices in this.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
peterst6906 said:
Yes, though I can see the Russians being ****ed off about paying a foreign company for the rights to the tour of their own country.

Business practices inside Russia are one thing, but being outplayed by a foreign entity wouldn't sit well. The Russians are very proud and most of the population would take the view that in order to hold the Tour of Russia, it is Russia that should be paid by the UCI, not the other way around.

More evidence of UCI corrupt practices in this.

When you want the UCI to guarantee the top teams, you gotta pay.

They can hold their own race but wont get anyone from the tops teams to race.

Welcome to the world of making Pat and Hein rich. It is why these guys dont give sh!t about anything to do with doping or have no intentions of standing down.

I doubt many of the top teams are interested to go and race in Russia otherwise there would be no need for 7million.
 
Benotti69 said:
When you want the UCI to guarantee the top teams, you gotta pay.

I'd actually be okay if the money went into the UCI in exchange for a slot and points on the elite calendar, but it's not. Or, at least that's what Makarov is suggesting.

Keep in mind he's got a senior position inside the UCI as the President(?) of the European Federations. He's also sponsoring the European federations.

He might be an interesting source for more controversy.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
DirtyWorks said:
I'd actually be okay if the money went into the UCI in exchange for a slot and points on the elite calendar, but it's not. Or, at least that's what Makarov is suggesting.

Keep in mind he's got a senior position inside the UCI as the President(?) of the European Federations. He's also sponsoring the European federations.

He might be an interesting source for more controversy.

I would be okay if they paid for lots of things, but it is where the money goes is and was always the problem.
 
It seems to me that it's just exactly like the Formula 1 business model. Private company collecting the rights (FOM), oversight by the FIA, and the leaders of the FIA put in place by the votes of motoring clubs all around the world.

If you have a look at the link here you will see the list. 1 vote a piece. Lobbying normally happens hard in the African countries as votes are easy to come by. It also doesn't take into account the number of members, so for example the AA in Britain has the same amount of voting rights as the Zambia Motorsport Association.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_FIA_member_organisations

It then also means that the FIA are able to do pretty much whatever they want due to the fact that they can't get voted out. It's also why they are so hell-bent on "promoting and globalising" motorsport (though for F1 they did this some years ago). We're seeing the same thing with the UCI now. Not sure how many of you have done the UCI survey lately, but there's certainly some mention of globalising the sport. The reason for this is that by creating these federations, it's another vote in the bag.

Hospitality and trackside advertising are run by the Formula One Group, through its dedicated arms Allsport Management and APM.

I'm sure it's only a matter of time until something similar is in place for cycling. (unless it already is...).

It's the same old adage - privatise the profits, socialise the losses. It's worked in capitalism for a long time now.

I'm relatively certain that Pat and Hein see themselves as Bernie Ecclestone and Max Mosley (heh heh) / Jean Todt.

The best we can hope for is a dungeon, a mistress and a camera... :eek:
 
Jul 6, 2010
2,340
0
0
That quote is enough to reveal that Phat's an insane, geriatric, xenophobic nut job.

Lotsa hate for some of the biggest cycling nations out there. Nice stance for the head of an international federation.

Sack Pat...
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
86TDFWinner said:
That seems to be becoming increasingly more difficult to do as the months roll on. Nice thought though.

exactly, he seems to be sitting this out, waiting for it to blow over, as expected.

good thing cycling has already changed internally. :rolleyes:
 
JMBeaushrimp said:
That quote is enough to reveal that Phat's an insane, geriatric, xenophobic nut job.

Lotsa hate for some of the biggest cycling nations out there. Nice stance for the head of an international federation.

Sack Pat...

Let's just start with the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune in Denmark.

How could he have possibly predicted history (sic)?

“The Anglo-Saxon [approach], which would be here [the Netherlands], it would be Germany, the United Kingdom, Denmark – is the complete opposite…it is very important that at the end of the day the Anglo-Saxon approach wins out – because if it doesn’t, then the sport is doomed.”

When he made that statement, the following had already occurred:

three of the five members of the Danish national road team doped at the 2004 Athens Olympics

And, barely four months later Bjarne butted in:

At the end of April 2007, former Riis' soigneur Jeff d'Hont wrote a book about the doping practices of Riis and other riders during his time in the cycling business.[16] ...on 25 May 2007 Riis issued a press release that he also had made "mistakes" in the past,[20] and in the following press conference confessed to taking EPO, growth hormone and cortisone for 5 years, from 1993 to 1998, including during his victory in the 1996 Tour de France

Surely Phat must have been clowning around. Or, maybe he really is the clown that the Swiss courts say that he isn't.

forbids Floyd Landis to state that the Union Cycliste Internationale, Patrick (Pat) McQuaid and/or Henricus (Hein) Verbruggen ... are clowns...

Fortunately, I am not Floyd Landis and am not bound by this ruling in the Swiss Courts. Thus, I can state emphatically and accurately that Pat McQuaid is a clown.

Dave.
 
May 13, 2009
3,093
3
0
Basecase said:
Bookies odds and general media vibes would seem to indicate Pat McQuaid will be reelected.

Thoughts? More importantly - actions?

Give up on cycling for a few years. After seeing the PN results, I decided to just watch the spring classics this year and forget everything else until Lombardia. Can't take the BS anymore.