The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
fatandfast said:Why would the UCI not publish a list or testers and provide them with ID's that could be verified at the point of the test, The answer is they are a mafia. Lance taking a shower and a twenty plus minute time span while JB verified the true identity of the tester is dumb. I think that fake hair or blood would have been difficult to provide even for Armstrong. Now it is out there that the tests cost less than 400 dollars at the lab level, so why not have a monthly test of every rider for all year long for a couple of years from the UCI, on top of different fed and race tests the dopers would explode while trying to juggle their life of lies. The UCI doesn't want a 100% clean zero dopers policy because it would put them out of work. Did they already sent teams a list of names of testers who could show up to your house or hotel ? No. the don't want to fix it or they would. A friend at a cancer lab in So Cal told me why not divide the blood into 3 or 4 samples stored at different places. The A sample can be tested by students for 50-75 dollars, if something is found the other samples can be tested.