- Mar 10, 2009
toppermost said:So.. you like the new format I am guessing?
Yeah boycotts are childish. Unlike ranting and raving, and stamping feet (like I was doing before)?
A boycott is a civilized way for an otherwise powerless group to express a valid opinion.
Question: you seem quite defensive about the website that you are essentially arguing is not a good source. You more or less said you have to go to a Euro/site to get good info, but here you are supporting the defamers.
Or- are you just picking a fight with me because I called you out for being a #$% after I posted the tour website?
Ah yes, that's exactly the definition of a boycott. Comes to mind the EU boycott of hormone beef from the USA, a boycott from USA to travel to/buy products from Cuba the last 50+ years. All powerless groups to express valid opinions...
Toppermost, the selfless crusader, a Martyr in the making, effortlessly he fights against all evil that is affects the 'cycling community'. Do you have problems with your cycling news source, call toppermost! Have you seen suspicious activities that could be linked to doping cases, call toppermost! Do you think Patt McQuaid is harming cycling, toppermost is on your side!
Your opinion is that you don't like the site. You have voiced that opinion, multiple times if I am correct. If you still don't like it, after a couple of weeks, godspeed, and don't look back in anger...
On toppermost of that, your logic reflects the intellectual capacity of a three year old. Remember the "If you are not with us you are against us" cliche? By telling you off for your boycott, I am not necessarily supporting anyone...