Baloise Belgium Tour 2022 (June 15-19)

Page 6 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jun 25, 2015
5,332
5,421
23,180
I agree, you'd have to prove intent but does anyone really think Lampaert just decided on his own to take out his teammate's closest rival? Assume there was a clear message sent from QS: don't let Wellens contest the next bonus sprint.
 
It's a team sport - DQ the team.
Yep. Next time a rider gets caught doping, throw out the entire team, as the entire team benefits from one rider doping. A football team also benefits as a whole from one player preventing a goal from being scored with an illegal action. So a red card for only that player does not cut it.

Obviously they should not DQ the entire team but suspend Lampaert.
 
Last edited:
Mar 19, 2009
2,119
564
13,080
That was just a sad thing to see. Unsportsmanlike conduct. UCI should really take a look at this case and in which light it puts the sport. Lampaert should get hit harder, even though he might just be Quick Steps scape goat.
 
Entire teams can get suspended after multiple doping infrictions of individual riders.
Multiple... when it there is systematic doping going on within the team. Which is a completely different issue than what we are discussing/comparing here.

What happened?

Are we once again arguing that DQing people after the last stage is sufficient punishment?
No idea. Are you arguing it is, because i can't remember anybody making that claim.
 
Jan 3, 2010
1,380
213
10,880
Multiple... when it there is systematic doping going on within the team. Which is a completely different issue than what we are discussing/comparing here.
It doesn't have to be systematic. The infriction of the rules is different., but that as a consequence of a mistakes made by teammates, an entire team can be punished is the point.
 
Feb 20, 2010
33,064
15,272
28,180
It doesn't have to be systematic. The infriction of the rules is different., but that as a consequence of a mistakes made by teammates, an entire team can be punished is the point.
Maybe a similar thing regards multiple fair play infractions leading to a team temporary timeout in the same manner, though, could feasibly work.

After all, that way, yes, you get away with an incident like today's with only a final day DQ if it's an isolated occurrence, but if there are multiple infractions, then you have either a particular rider who is a bad apple and is costing their teammates and that becomes a black mark on them for their career, or you have a culture of unsportsmanlike behaviour at the team and can't argue the suspension.
 
May 2, 2019
814
908
7,180
They have invested so much in Bennett bringing in three riders of his choice. I guess Bennett would have expected to have at least two of those at his disposal in the Tour but given how well Bora have shown in stage races this season I would expect they'd be thinking of giving Vlasov more support and maybe sending Bennett to the Vuelta.

The updated line-up for the Vuelta includes Higuita, Hindley, Kelderman and Buchmann. At least the first two will be there and going for GC. So there's even less space in the team there.

I think there are two option. Number 1 take the sunk cost fallacy and send Bennett to the Tour with some support. Probably it will be only 2-4 stages were he will disappoint and for the rest of the race they can go for stages. They won't have to ride on the flat stages and close gaps.

Number 2 don't take Bennett and accept that the fallout will be lead to him leaving the team at the end of the year. Try to keep van Poppel and let Mullen/Archbold walk as well. If there's no place for Bennett in this Tour squad there will be no place for him until the Vuelta 2023 in any GT anyways in my opinion.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sandisfan
Sep 14, 2009
6,300
3,561
23,180
A simple solution that rolling forward would likely be more preventative would be to either award equal bonus seconds to the rider that was impacted, or trade bonus seconds if that makes more sense in the given situation. That would certainly present a disincentive to such douchebaggery.
 
Feb 16, 2010
15,334
6,031
28,180
Clipboard.gif

FTFY
 
Jul 10, 2014
14,991
25,986
28,180
Too bad Mr. Belgium Tour himself, aka Remco, wasn't here to set the record straight. He would have won this by minutes, these lesser riders though need things such as a golden kilometer to decide a winner.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Sandisfan
That was just a sad thing to see. Unsportsmanlike conduct. UCI should really take a look at this case and in which light it puts the sport. Lampaert should get hit harder, even though he might just be Quick Steps scape goat.

This should be a penalty for the whole team not just Lampaert...He was not acting alone as can be seen by the footage
Dreadful unsportsmanlike like behavior
 
Sep 4, 2017
3,527
4,142
19,180
It doesn't have to be systematic. The infriction of the rules is different., but that as a consequence of a mistakes made by teammates, an entire team can be punished is the point.
A parallel could be drawn with the relay events in athletics where a failed doping test for 1 member of the team results in the whole teams result being annulled and a disqualification. It’s happened on a few occasions that a team has had to return their medals years later after new testing processes emerge and retests of samples show up banned products.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sandisfan
Sep 4, 2017
3,527
4,142
19,180
The updated line-up for the Vuelta includes Higuita, Hindley, Kelderman and Buchmann. At least the first two will be there and going for GC. So there's even less space in the team there.

I think there are two option. Number 1 take the sunk cost fallacy and send Bennett to the Tour with some support. Probably it will be only 2-4 stages were he will disappoint and for the rest of the race they can go for stages. They won't have to ride on the flat stages and close gaps.

Number 2 don't take Bennett and accept that the fallout will be lead to him leaving the team at the end of the year. Try to keep van Poppel and let Mullen/Archbold walk as well. If there's no place for Bennett in this Tour squad there will be no place for him until the Vuelta 2023 in any GT anyways in my opinion.
There is always option 3 which is to take Bennett but without any dedicated riders and direct him to follow the other sprint trains in the finales he is able to contest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Sep 7, 2011
1,568
347
11,180
There is always option 3 which is to take Bennett but without any dedicated riders and direct him to follow the other sprint trains in the finales he is able to contest.

That's actually how he used to do it a lot of the time when he was first with them. he had a lot of success surfing wheels in the final couple of Km.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Jul 4, 2009
2,782
2,518
17,180
unfortunate to see people encouraging dangerous racing on this forum.

Cycling remains in the low end of morality of sports, on many levels.

In very few sports is the presence of Russians so little debated as in cycling.

In very few sports is risk-taking so admired as in cycling - crashes are just part of it.

In very few sports is intended dangerous behaviour towards opponents so leniently punished as in cycling.

(And I haven't even mentioned doping yet.)
 
Aug 1, 2016
1,050
1,495
13,680
Cycling remains in the low end of morality of sports, on many levels.

In very few sports is the presence of Russians so little debated as in cycling.

In very few sports is risk-taking so admired as in cycling - crashes are just part of it.

In very few sports is intended dangerous behaviour towards opponents so leniently punished as in cycling.

(And I haven't even mentioned doping yet.)

I guess you are supporting to be more lenient towards Russian riders, right? Because there is only one russian cyclist currently active in the Pro peloton due to UCI actions.

I don't think barring everyone from a country to take part in sports is desirable or moral. I would say it is quite the opposite. I don't even know how avoiding a single Russian rider who has indeed spoken against war to take part in competitions is moral.

About crashes, dangerous behaviour... honestly, do you know motor sports? How many motorcyclist do get killed every year just at the Isle de Man competition? And what about the Dakar, even Moto GP or other competitions? F1, Rallies... Those sports are extremely more dangerous than cycling.

What about football? Football is based upon sportmanship, every player tries to cheat, simulates contacts to force fouls, penaltys, losing time when your team is ahead... we've seen players fouling VERY HARD their opponents on purpose.

Doping? Won't go in there, but we have had doping cases in Football, NBA has been more or less a doping paradise. Nadal plays with permanent TUEs thanks to his foot...

Besides, morality is subject to personal and social views.