The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
LaFlorecita said:Another poll![]()
![]()
A 1 km hill at 6%, Gilbert has been unbeatable on those for a while. I don't know if he still is, but I guess so.Arnout said:Depends a lot on the stage/race that precedes the sprint. If it's easy, Sagan. Medium, can be Sagan, Gilbert or Purito. If it's hard, Purito.
I am sure some posters will counter with a result in an obscure race, but this is just a generality.
The Hitch said:Gilbert is the better hill.rider but if he wins its because he dropped valverde and sagan earlier, sprinting got **** to do.with it.
El Pistolero said:Why didn't he follow him at Valkenburg then? Or La Lastrilla in the Vuelta? Or Saint Nicholas at LBL?
Sprinting for 2k at 6% isn't really sprinting, so the thread is sort of pointless anyway. A real uphill sprint is max 500 meters or so, and then Sagan is without a doubt the fastest. Maybe even Greipel.The Hitch said:how do any of.those examples.contradict anything i said?
theyoungest said:Sprinting for 2k at 6% isn't really sprinting, so the thread is sort of pointless anyway. A real uphill sprint is max 500 meters or so, and then Sagan is without a doubt the fastest. Maybe even Greipel.
theyoungest said:Sprinting for 2k at 6% isn't really sprinting, so the thread is sort of pointless anyway. A real uphill sprint is max 500 meters or so, and then Sagan is without a doubt the fastest. Maybe even Greipel.
Miburo said:I made it 2km cause when it's 500 m Sagan wins easy IMO. But will he still have that after having a hill of 1.5 km. Not sprinting for 2 km obviously.
Who can 'sprint' for 2 km? impossible![]()
El Pistolero said:They mean a short explosive effort on a hill. I think all my examples are a statement of that.
The Hitch said:I said valverde and sagan could beat Gilbert in a sprint but that Gilbert can drop them earlier and you come back with 3 examples of.Gilbert dropping valverde earlier 2 of which the race did not end on the hill 1 of which valverde actually came back and beat them.
And you ask.me.how i explain them![]()
El Pistolero said:Do you really think the outcome of the WC would've been any different had it finished on the Cauberg?Gilbert's time on the Cauberg at the WC was faster than Gaspa's time on the Cauberg during the AGR lol(and thus also faster than Sagan's time).
And La Lastrilla was an uphill finish where Gilbert won. Where did he drop Valverde earlier lol?
Same goes for Saint Nicholas. Had the finish been on it, Valverde would've lost.
Ps: Valverde didn't come back and beat Gilbert in LBL. Evans came back with someone in his wheel all the time.![]()
theyoungest said:A 1 km hill at 6%, Gilbert has been unbeatable on those for a while. I don't know if he still is, but I guess so.
Anything longer, I don't know. Valverde maybe.
Arnout said:In 2011, yes. But so far 2011 seems to be an exception, in all other years he hasn't been unbeatable.
But my post was making the point that with 2 HC climbs before 500m hill, Purito will win.
El Pistolero said:Looked pretty unbeatable to me on the Cauberg this year. Which is a 1.2km hill with an average of 6%.
We all know he stuffed up his winter prep last year. Why else do you think he's starting Down Under this year?
Ryo Hazuki said:how about giving another example of 2012?