python said:it seems like you have a reading comprehension problem. where did i say you believe he did not dope in 1996 ?
You wrote this:
may be you don't want to hear what novi is trying to say - your home state boy was a dope all along, from 1996 to 2005 whilst the other evidence surfaced ?
From that I would conclude you would think I wouldn't want Novitsky to say these things because I am a "fanboy" or "Public Strategy Plant" or any other tired label trotted out to somebody that doesn't follow the pitchfork CW in here. I read that as you saying I didn't want to hear it because I don't believe it. If I am mistaken then you have my apologies.
Face it, python. I think he doped as much as you do, probably agree with you on all those bad things he did. We probably differ on how much of an advantage that gained him over his competition and whether or not he had the talent to win GT's within him without PED's. And, it is not personal with me with him. And, I don't do cartwheels and paint it in the worse possible scenario for him of what could happen when new info comes out. That makes me the enemy I guess.