Thomas Frei sounds like an awesome guy. No lies, no excuses, puts the responsibility where it lies. He has one shot of comfortably supporting himself and family both now and after cycling and he took it. Unfortunately for him it failed.
There are many cyclist now and in the past who have made a healthy living from doping, where before that their only options were the mines, farms, etc. Sport is a very short career. I don't blame them for taking all they can get while they can. I just hope they aren't hurting themselves too much. In fact with how hard pro cycling currently is, what is worse for their bodies, to dope or not to dope. I think it is a fine line.
I personaly would not dope due to religous reasons (I trust God will provide a way for me to support my family) but there are many non-athletes who lose their morals for less money than that, or those that cheat in a monopoly or rugby game to gain an illegal advantage. Is one any worse than the other. I don't think so. Who here would do something slightly immoral if it meant the easy life financially for our families?
Money and power corrupts. It's human nature. Let's not judge him for his decision to dope (as we are just as bad if we have cheated in the past), but rather lets congratulate him on his decision and honesty to take personal responsibility (sounds like a good sign he may not be planning on returning to cycling - not many can and remain competitive and clean).