Bonus Seconds in Grand Tours

Page 3 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

How would you like bonus seconds to be awarded in Grand Tours? (Multiple votes)


  • Total voters
    69
Introduce a Mario Kart -like system with mystery boxes on the road. Riders get to grab a box, but they never know what's inside. Could be +20 seconds or -30 seconds. Would make it more interesting for casual viewers as well.

I'm not a fan of bonis because their impact has become a viable option for certain riders to build their entire tactical plan on, which leads to negative racing. On the other hand on an uphill finish, actual times should be taken, and not by the first finisher of groups within 1 second. If there are 10 riders finishing, single file, with each half a second in between, time registration should actually resemble that, and not put everyone in the same time.
 
I'd suspect you'd have less crashes with no 3km rule and real times at the line.
There's two points to this: the first is the 3k rule and the second is actual timing instead of group timing. The latter I think has already been discussed and people either agree with the safety argument or they don't.

The first point, though, about the 3k rule itself, is worth considering. In the only study of it that I am aware of, it is claimed that moral hazard means that the 3k rule has actually increased the incidence of crashes. The more you try to make some things safe, the more danger you add. PDF lkink.
 
If you think about it - in a rather weird way - the 3 K rule is actually one of the few cases in cycling where "filming", like some football players are notorious for, would actually make some sort of tactical sense.
" Oh... I can't quite keep up." *Flop*.

(Would also hurt a bit more than in football...)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
If you think about it - in a rather weird way - the 3 K rule is actually one of the few cases in cycling where "filming", like some football players are notorious for, would actually make some sort of tactical sense.
" Oh... I can't quite keep up." *Flop*.

(Would also hurt a bit more than in football...)
We've already had the "fake puncture", or not for Remco, but I think you're suggesting some kamikaze tactic, where a guy shouts, "banzai!" and deliberately rides into someone else, or a piece of traffic furniture.
 
There's two points to this: the first is the 3k rule and the second is actual timing instead of group timing. The latter I think has already been discussed and people either agree with the safety argument or they don't.

The first point, though, about the 3k rule itself, is worth considering. In the only study of it that I am aware of, it is claimed that moral hazard means that the 3k rule has actually increased the incidence of crashes. The more you try to make some things safe, the more danger you add. PDF lkink.

which is why the 3km rule needs to be confined to the history books. It's not working