Could be "the wrong Saudis". I assume that even in Saudi Arabia not necessarily all rich people like all the other rich people?Do you think Jayco will not join when their co-sponsor is from Saudi Arabia.
Could be "the wrong Saudis". I assume that even in Saudi Arabia not necessarily all rich people like all the other rich people?Do you think Jayco will not join when their co-sponsor is from Saudi Arabia.
Er... about that...New HLN piece has barely new info, still don't really know what the point of this whole thing is, well unless it actually is to just rip off the existing cycling fanbase and get rich while doing it.
UAE ,Kuwait and Qatar have shown tons of interest in sports funding, Kazakhstan also had some larger sport funding ventures. Bahrain already got skin in the gameCould be "the wrong Saudis". I assume that even in Saudi Arabia not necessarily all rich people like all the other rich people?
it won't die. it will change, but it won't die. One-Cycling will not help the sportOh well, we’ll just keep watching until the sport is dead then
It’ll keep shrinking compared to other sports until it’s as big as CX, and no one really cares anymore. Which is already happening the past decades, it’ll only go further like thisit won't die. it will change, but it won't die. One-Cycling will not help the sport
Compared to which other sports ?It’ll keep shrinking compared to other sports until it’s as big as CX, and no one really cares anymore. Which is already happening the past decades, it’ll only go further like this
For me, the mere fact that the name of that snake Richard Plugge is attached to this project is enough to make all the alarm bells ring.
I read this news as a good one.
You may not like the guy, he correctly points out that the economic model of cycling is deeply flawed and tries to do something about it. Participating in the biggest races on the calendar means a net loss for a cycling team. How is that sustainable? Only teams with unlimited money from shady sources like petrostates in the Middle East can survive in such an environment. That's good news to you?For me, the mere fact that the name of that snake Richard Plugge is attached to this project is enough to make all the alarm bells ring.
I read this news as a good one.
Oh well, we’ll just keep watching until the sport is dead then
Unlike other sports, cycling teams literally carry the names of their main sponsors. Every time a cycling team is mentioned, it's direct advertising for the sponsors. So let's look at this the other way round. It's not the team that loses money, but the sponsors who pay to appear for hours on television and be mentioned in any publication or television programme devoted to cycling. How much money would such exposure cost them in TV spots, for example?Participating in the biggest races on the calendar means a net loss for a cycling team.
I don't even know which point you're trying to make. Yes, cycling has quite a high return on investment. For the money Quickstep puts into cycling they'd maybe get to be shirt sponsor of some low level football team. But the point is that unlike in basically every other major sport, the teams themselves don't earn anything from participating in the biggest events. They just have to be happy they get the chance to participate.Unlike other sports, cycling teams literally carry the names of their main sponsors. Every time a cycling team is mentioned, it's direct advertising for the sponsors. So let's look at this the other way round. It's not the team that loses money, but the sponsors who pay to appear for hours on television and be mentioned in any publication or television programme devoted to cycling. How much money would such exposure cost them in TV spots, for example?
It doesn't matter if you like him or not! That's not the issue here. Since when are ideas and plans about the likeability of the person making them. It's like modern elections where people vote because they dislike the opponent, regardless of the platform, and against their own interest.I love Jorgenson, Brennan, Tulett, Yates, Gloag, Campenaerts, McLay, I cheer Vingo. but I dislike Plugge, yes.
Since everything about Plugge cries intellectual dishonesty. It's not about not liking his beige trousers.It doesn't matter if you like him or not! That's not the issue here. Since when are ideas and plans about the likeability of the person making them. It's like modern elections where people vote because they dislike the opponent, regardless of the platform, and against their own interest.
I don't think cycling not being like every other major sport is an issue. Other major sports have their own problems. I am sure Plugge's idea have consequences that go beyond simple financial balance. I believe in people gathering for free along the roads. And I am not sure Plugge shares this point of vue.I don't even know which point you're trying to make. Yes, cycling has quite a high return on investment. For the money Quickstep puts into cycling they'd maybe get to be shirt sponsor of some low level football team. But the point is that unlike in basically every other major sport, the teams themselves don't earn anything from participating in the biggest events. They just have to be happy they get the chance to participate.
Like what for example? I don't even like the guy, a lot of what he says is a bit too technocratic for my liking, but that doesn't mean he isn't right.Since everything about Plugge cries intellectual dishonesty. It's not about not liking his beige trousers.
Cycling not being like any other major sport in terms of it's financial sustainability is very much an issue. Why should the money from the tv rights of the Tour go to some French family rather than to Tadej Pogacar and to his team? Please explain.I don't think cycling not being like every other major sport is an issue. Other major sports have their own problems. I am sure Plugge's idea have consequences that go beyond simple financial balance. I believe in people gathering for free along the roads. And I am not sure Plugge shares this point of vue.
To sum this up: I have a bad feeling about this.