Dazed and Confused said:Would he retire if he gets the rainbow jersey again?
Dazed and Confused said:Would he retire if he gets the rainbow jersey again?
You're assuming he'll show up in truely good shape. Maybe he'll just ride along one last time.hrotha said:I get that he's an Aussie and all that, but retiring after the TDU never made any sense to me. Spend one last winter/summer training and making sacrifices like not eating whatever you want on Christmas, and then only use that form in one race? Yeah, not a good deal.
Well yeah but I doubt he'll show up in Betancur form either.trevim said:You're assuming he'll show up in truely good shape. Maybe he'll just ride along one last time.
hrotha said:I get that he's an Aussie and all that, but retiring after the TDU never made any sense to me. Spend one last winter/summer training and making sacrifices like not eating whatever you want on Christmas, and then only use that form in one race? Yeah, not a good deal.
hrotha said:I get that he's an Aussie and all that, but retiring after the TDU never made any sense to me. Spend one last winter/summer training and making sacrifices like not eating whatever you want on Christmas, and then only use that form in one race? Yeah, not a good deal.
del1962 said:Depends if he is trying to be competative or it is just some sort of farewell to his fans though.
Yeah I think he lacks a bit in the classics department: he had the quality to win Lombardia or Liege and those would look great on his record. Great career though.auscyclefan94 said:A bit of a shame but a great career. Probably was unlucky not to win a few more big races but such is life. I will be lucky enough to see him race in his swansong around Barwon Heads.![]()
Epic!thrawn said:Cadel to retire after Australian races next year - http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cycling...from-cycling-in-february-20140926-10m94g.html
trevim said:Yeah I think he lacks a bit in the classics department: he had the quality to win Lombardia or Liege and those would look great on his record. Great career though.
1-week races was all he ever won as a stage racercineteq said:Evans can still win 1-week races. Then again, I think his retirement has to do more with wife and kid.
Cadel doesn't do that. He always likes to get involved. In front of his home fans I can't possibly imagine that he would just do a lap of honour waving to the crowd. Even if he has no form whatsoever he will try to do well.trevim said:You're assuming he'll show up in truely good shape. Maybe he'll just ride along one last time.
For much of it a lot of it was his own fault, I always thought he'd wasted his big chance to win the Tour in 2008. When he finally came out of his shell I thought it was just too late to capitalize on his peak years, but he did just have enough time left to win the big one. He has gone about accumulating the palmarès that his talent level should deserve, and in winning the Tour and the Worlds he joins a very compelling group of riders at the pinnacle of the sport.auscyclefan94 said:A bit of a shame but a great career. Probably was unlucky not to win a few more big races but such is life. I will be lucky enough to see him race in his swansong around Barwon Heads.![]()
Until 2011 that was always the debate, who was the best between the two. Evans was the better rider on paper, but Menchov had actually got the wins.Archibald said:Always felt he should have a better GT palmares though. To have less GTs than Menchov seems wrong...
movingtarget said:In 2008 Evans was up against a very strong CSC team with three candidates for victory in both Schlecks and Sastre. I think Evans fall really cost him and the fact that it was almost impossible for him to cover all the attacks in the mountains from CSC. I still thought he could win the race in the final TT and was surprised with Sastre's TT performance and Evan's mediocre one by his standards. Sastre simply finished the fresher after sitting in the pack for the entire race and making one attack on the Alpe where he gained enough time. Evans had a much tougher race. Tactically CSC held all the cards and Evans reacted too late to Sastre's attack because he feared counterattacks from the Schlecks and when he did chase the time gap did not reduce by much.
I think 2007 was the one he really should have won although Rasmussen fans may disagree. In 2008 luck and CSC were too much for him. As for the so called wheelsucking I think he was conservative because he feared Contador so much in the mountains and had a lot of faith in his own TT ability which failed him in 2008. If he attacked more in the mountains he would have lost more time, it might have been more exciting for the fans but he and his DS knew the risks and I think the calculation was correct. As for the Worlds it's one day not three weeks which frees up the tactical concerns. He took his chance and had a superb victory and like most people have commented, that victory gave him a lot more confidence.
His climbing did not improve but he tempered his calculating style enough to win good races like Fleche, Tirreno and the Tour but even his Tour win showed him on the back foot not leading by attacking. He rode smart and rode to his strengths and topped it off with a TT he was always capable of after three weeks. Being near the top of GC throughout the race and finishing the race stronger than anyone else. Evans was never a pure climber and I think his climbing was overrated because of his mountain bike background.
I see him as more of an all rounder like Valverde but I think he was a smarter rider than Valverde even though physically Valverde may have been superior. Valverde is a great rider who has won a ton of races and should have won more but it is telling that Evans has a Tour win and Worlds but Valverde has not. The major difference between the two is that Evans has the better TT and Valverde has the better sprint but talent wise I think they are similar. I think Evans will always be irritated by not winning the 2007 and 2008 Tours but he has to be satisfied with what he has achieved. Maybe not the most popular rider but his determination and ability to suffer was never in doubt and he made the most of his ability with a few hiccups along the way which is common in a long sporting career.
Libertine Seguros said:Mendrisio was absolutely the turning point. A really good race won in a gutsy ride that many fans did not believe he had in him. Until then he had a great palmarès of placements but precious few wins, and it seemed like he was too timid a racer to grab those wins. That all changed in Mendrisio
Cookster15 said:2008 Tdf - yes his stage 9 crash was the biggest factor. I recall one of the rival team bosses said Evans ride to take yellow the following day on the slopes of the Hautacam while smashed up was "heroic" (can't remember who it was maybe Garmin?). Likewise knowing the energy he had expended in dealing with his injury and the 3 pronged CSC team his ride on the Alpe into a headwind with everyone except Sastre on his wheel was still gutsy - in hindsight a forerunner of his ride on the Galibier in 2011 that won him the Tour.
2007 Tdf - I think Evans made a tactical error in following the multiple attacks of both Rasmussen then Contador on the Plateau de Beille and lost two minutes when he finally blew 5km from the finish. It was telling that Liepheimer sucked wheels on that climb and finished 60 secs ahead of Evans by measuring his effort and not blowing.
2007 and 2008 was probably when Cadel was at his physiological peak so definitely missed opportunities for him.
In 2011 we saw Cadel had obviously learned from his mistakes of those two years and did not try to immediately follow the attacks but slowly rode back to the wheels.