I mean, why don't you read his stuff? Or stop complaining about his credentials. It's noted that he has not produced credentials, and as someone who has neither really looked at his blog (I'm not into the presentation format) or really knows about the science of doping, I don't feel qualified to comment. So I haven't. I suggest you do the same, lest you fall victim to the same thing you're complaining about, namely trying to get people to listen to you when they have no reason to do so (you have not addressed the actual points in the blog, nor have you said anything other than to note that the blogger isn't a scientist).del1962 said:Is that supposed to vouch for me believing the credebility of an anonymous blogger on the internet, and you think those who think Sky don't dope are gullible, oh the irony.
Your point is taken, and doesn't need to be repeated.