I don't quite get why people are being so defensive about criticism of Harmon, Kirby, Stadler and Waldorf, Duffield etc, or even Kelly, Roche, Smith, Backstedt or Crystal Balls Christy.
I don't doubt that it is 'difficult' talk for 4 hours and not say something stupid once in a while. However, they are professionals, not amateurs dragged in off the street and plonked down in front of a monitor and told 'talk for the next four hours about what you see'.
As professionals they should be prepared and competent at their job - and the ES commentators with the exception of Kelly aren't.
Most people when they **** up in public get slated for it, whether that is a DS, a politician, a rider or a footballer. Commentators are no different and saying 'its a tough job and you couldn't do it better' is a strawman argument. I am quite sure that being President of the US is a difficult job and I couldn't do it better, I am quite sure being President of the UCI is a tough job too, but that doesn't make the criticism of those individuals invalid.
And you know what, if all I was tasked with doing was spending fours a day looking for and jingostically cheerleading for Cuddles, Wiggins, Frodo and the nearest Cack rider, then yes I probably could do a better job.
The odd mistake, difficulty identifying riders, etc fair enough, but when it is four hours littered with avoidable mistakes, stupidity and nationalist cheerleading that is when people get ****ed off. That Kirby/Harmon show absolutely no interest in behaving like professionals and preparing properly to do their job and instead taking the cheap and easy option is why they are so often criticised.